Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 59.72.1. Let U \to X be an étale morphism of quasi-compact and quasi-separated schemes (for example an étale morphism of Noetherian schemes). Then there exists a partition X = \coprod _ i X_ i by constructible locally closed subschemes such that X_ i \times _ X U \to X_ i is finite étale for all i.

Proof. If U \to X is separated, then this is More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.45.4. In general, we may assume X is affine. Choose a finite affine open covering U = \bigcup U_ j. Apply the previous case to all the morphisms U_ j \to X and U_ j \cap U_{j'} \to X and choose a common refinement X = \coprod X_ i of the resulting partitions. After refining the partition further we may assume X_ i affine as well. Fix i and set V = U \times _ X X_ i. The morphisms V_ j = U_ j \times _ X X_ i \to X_ i and V_{jj'} = (U_ j \cap U_{j'}) \times _ X X_ i \to X_ i are finite étale. Hence V_ j and V_{jj'} are affine schemes and V_{jj'} \subset V_ j is closed as well as open (since V_{jj'} \to X_ i is proper, so Morphisms, Lemma 29.41.7 applies). Then V = \bigcup V_ j is separated because \mathcal{O}(V_ j) \to \mathcal{O}(V_{jj'}) is surjective, see Schemes, Lemma 26.21.7. Thus the previous case applies to V \to X_ i and we can further refine the partition if needed (it actually isn't but we don't need this). \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 59.72: Auxiliary lemmas on morphisms

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.