Lemma 35.31.3. The property \mathcal{P}(f)=“f is unramified” is étale local on the source. The property \mathcal{P}(f)=“f is G-unramified” is étale local on the source.
Proof. We are going to use Lemma 35.26.4. By Morphisms, Lemma 29.35.3 the property of being unramified (resp. G-unramified) is local for Zariski on source and target. By Morphisms, Lemmas 29.35.4 and 29.36.5 we see the precomposition of an unramified (resp. G-unramified) morphism by an étale morphism is unramified (resp. G-unramified). Finally, suppose that X \to Y is a morphism of affine schemes and that f : X' \to X is a surjective étale morphism of affine schemes such that X' \to Y is unramified (resp. G-unramified). Then X' \to Y is of finite type (resp. finite presentation), and by Lemma 35.14.2 (resp. Lemma 35.14.1) we see that X \to Y is of finite type (resp. finite presentation) also. By Morphisms, Lemma 29.34.16 we have a short exact sequence
As X' \to Y is unramified we see that the middle term is zero. Hence, as f is faithfully flat we see that \Omega _{X/Y} = 0. Hence X \to Y is unramified (resp. G-unramified), see Morphisms, Lemma 29.35.2. This proves the last assumption of Lemma 35.26.4 and finishes the proof. \square
Comments (0)