History of tag 040U
Go back to the tag's page.
type |
time |
link |
changed the statement and the proof
|
2011-08-10 |
65ce54f |
LaTeX: \Spec
Introduced the macro
\def\Spec{\mathop{\rm Spec}}
and changed all the occurences of \text{Spec} into \Spec.
|
moved the statement to file decent-spaces.tex
|
2011-06-10 |
52c6ad3 |
Decent Algebraic Spaces
Created a new chapter "Decent Algebraic Spaces" and moved most
of the material on local conditions of algebraic spaces in
there. In the next few commits we will fix the breakage that this
causes.
The reason for the move is that this material is difficult to
understand for the beginner and that most of the other material
in Properties of Spaces and Morphisms of Spaces is easier and
more analogous to what happens for schemes.
An added advantage is that we can use results on morphisms of
algebraic spaces in the new chapter, hence it becomes easier to
develop the theory of decent spaces.
|
changed the proof
|
2011-06-10 |
52c6ad3 |
Decent Algebraic Spaces
Created a new chapter "Decent Algebraic Spaces" and moved most
of the material on local conditions of algebraic spaces in
there. In the next few commits we will fix the breakage that this
causes.
The reason for the move is that this material is difficult to
understand for the beginner and that most of the other material
in Properties of Spaces and Morphisms of Spaces is easier and
more analogous to what happens for schemes.
An added advantage is that we can use results on morphisms of
algebraic spaces in the new chapter, hence it becomes easier to
develop the theory of decent spaces.
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2010-10-09 |
2b090dd |
End conversion of etale to \'etale.
|
assigned tag 040U
|
2010-01-17 |
aeaa969
|
Tags: added new tags
|
created statement with label lemma-weak-UR-finite-above-x in spaces-properties.tex
|
2010-01-08 |
2e77361 |
Properties of Spaces: Fix next lemma.
Lemma 03JV was wrong since it used the previously erroneous
Lemma 03JS. We split of the weaker condition Lemma
\ref{lemma-weak-UR-finite-above-x} (does not have a tag yet)
and corrected Lemma 03JS by removing two of the four conditions.
Presumably we can add another condition to the list of
equivalent conditions of Lemma 03JS, namely as suggested by
David Rydh:
"there exists a family of etale morphisms U_i --> X which is
jointly surjective and such that for each i the fibres of
U_i --> X and U_i \times_X U_i --> X
over x are finite (as in Lemma 03JT and the fixed Lemma 03JS)"
This should go on the todo list.
|