Lemma 37.22.11. The property \mathcal{P}(f)=“the fibres of f are locally Noetherian and f is Cohen-Macaulay” is local in the fppf topology on the target and local in the syntomic topology on the source.
Proof. We have \mathcal{P}(f) = \mathcal{P}_1(f) \wedge \mathcal{P}_2(f) where \mathcal{P}_1(f)=“f is flat”, and \mathcal{P}_2(f)=“the fibres of f are locally Noetherian and Cohen-Macaulay”. We know that \mathcal{P}_1 is local in the fppf topology on the source and the target, see Descent, Lemmas 35.23.15 and 35.27.1. Thus we have to deal with \mathcal{P}_2.
Let f : X \to Y be a morphism of schemes. Let \{ \varphi _ i : Y_ i \to Y\} _{i \in I} be an fppf covering of Y. Denote f_ i : X_ i \to Y_ i the base change of f by \varphi _ i. Let i \in I and let y_ i \in Y_ i be a point. Set y = \varphi _ i(y_ i). Note that
and that \kappa (y_ i)/\kappa (y) is a finitely generated field extension. Hence if X_ y is locally Noetherian, then X_{i, y_ i} is locally Noetherian, see Varieties, Lemma 33.11.1. And if in addition X_ y is Cohen-Macaulay, then X_{i, y_ i} is Cohen-Macaulay, see Varieties, Lemma 33.13.1. Thus \mathcal{P}_2 is fppf local on the target.
Let \{ X_ i \to X\} be a syntomic covering of X. Let y \in Y. In this case \{ X_{i, y} \to X_ y\} is a syntomic covering of the fibre. Hence the locality of \mathcal{P}_2 for the syntomic topology on the source follows from Descent, Lemma 35.17.2. Combining the above the lemma follows. \square
Comments (0)
There are also: