The Stacks project

Lemma 37.8.6. Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes. The following are equivalent:

  1. $f$ is formally ├ętale,

  2. $f$ is formally unramified and the universal first order thickening of $X$ over $S$ is equal to $X$,

  3. $f$ is formally unramified and $\mathcal{C}_{X/S} = 0$, and

  4. $\Omega _{X/S} = 0$ and $\mathcal{C}_{X/S} = 0$.

Proof. Actually, the last assertion only make sense because $\Omega _{X/S} = 0$ implies that $\mathcal{C}_{X/S}$ is defined via Lemma 37.6.7 and Definition 37.7.2. This also makes it clear that (3) and (4) are equivalent.

Either of the assumptions (1), (2), and (3) imply that $f$ is formally unramified. Hence we may assume $f$ is formally unramified. The equivalence of (1), (2), and (3) follow from the universal property of the universal first order thickening $X'$ of $X$ over $S$ and the fact that $X = X' \Leftrightarrow \mathcal{C}_{X/S} = 0$ since after all by definition $\mathcal{C}_{X/S} = \mathcal{C}_{X/X'}$ is the ideal sheaf of $X$ in $X'$. $\square$


Comments (1)

Comment #927 by Jim on

Suggested slogan: Vanishing of sheaves defines formally etale


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 04FE. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.