The Stacks project

Lemma 66.27.2. Same notation and assumptions as in Lemma 66.27.1 except that we also assume $U$ and $V$ are schemes. Via the identifications ( for $U \to X$ and $V \to Y$ the morphism of ringed topoi

\[ (g_{small}, g^\sharp ) : (\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (U_{\acute{e}tale}), \mathcal{O}_ U) \longrightarrow (\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (V_{\acute{e}tale}), \mathcal{O}_ V) \]

is $2$-isomorphic to the morphism $(f_{small, s}, f_ s^\sharp )$ constructed in Modules on Sites, Lemma 18.22.3 starting with $(f_{small}, f^\sharp )$ and the map $s : h_ U \to f_{small}^{-1}h_ V$ corresponding to $g$.

Proof. Note that $(g_{small}, g^\sharp )$ is $2$-isomorphic as a morphism of ringed topoi to the morphism of ringed topoi associated to the morphism of ringed sites $(g_{spaces, {\acute{e}tale}}, g^\sharp )$. Hence we conclude by Lemma 66.27.1 and Modules on Sites, Lemma 18.22.4. $\square$

Comments (0)

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 04M5. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.