Lemma 40.11.2. Notation and assumptions as in Situation 40.11.1. If a(R_1) is open in R_2, then a(R_1) is closed in R_2.
Proof. Let r_2 \in R_2 be a point in the closure of a(R_1). We want to show r_2 \in a(R_1). Pick k \subset k' and r_2' \in R'_2 adapted to (U, R_2, s_2, t_2, c_2) and r_2 as in Lemma 40.10.5. Let R_ i' be the restriction of R_ i via the morphism U' = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k') \to U = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k). Let a' : R'_1 \to R_2' be the base change of a. The diagram
is a fibre square. Hence the image of a' is the inverse image of the image of a via the morphism p_2 : R'_2 \to R_2. By Lemma 40.10.4 the map p_2 is surjective and open. Hence by Topology, Lemma 5.6.4 we see that r_2' is in the closure of a'(R'_1). This means that we may assume that r_2 \in R_2 has the property that the maps k \to \kappa (r_2) induced by s_2 and t_2 are isomorphisms.
In this case we can use Lemma 40.10.6. This lemma implies c(r_2, a(R_1)) is an open neighbourhood of r_2. Hence a(R_1) \cap c(r_2, a(R_1)) \not= \emptyset as we assumed that r_2 was a point of the closure of a(R_1). Using the inverse of R_2 and R_1 we see this means c_2(a(R_1), a(R_1)) contains r_2. As c_2(a(R_1), a(R_1)) \subset a(c_1(R_1, R_1)) = a(R_1) we conclude r_2 \in a(R_1) as desired. \square
Comments (0)