Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 40.11.2. Notation and assumptions as in Situation 40.11.1. If a(R_1) is open in R_2, then a(R_1) is closed in R_2.

Proof. Let r_2 \in R_2 be a point in the closure of a(R_1). We want to show r_2 \in a(R_1). Pick k \subset k' and r_2' \in R'_2 adapted to (U, R_2, s_2, t_2, c_2) and r_2 as in Lemma 40.10.5. Let R_ i' be the restriction of R_ i via the morphism U' = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k') \to U = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k). Let a' : R'_1 \to R_2' be the base change of a. The diagram

\xymatrix{ R'_1 \ar[r]_{a'} \ar[d]_{p_1} & R'_2 \ar[d]^{p_2} \\ R_1 \ar[r]^ a & R_2 }

is a fibre square. Hence the image of a' is the inverse image of the image of a via the morphism p_2 : R'_2 \to R_2. By Lemma 40.10.4 the map p_2 is surjective and open. Hence by Topology, Lemma 5.6.4 we see that r_2' is in the closure of a'(R'_1). This means that we may assume that r_2 \in R_2 has the property that the maps k \to \kappa (r_2) induced by s_2 and t_2 are isomorphisms.

In this case we can use Lemma 40.10.6. This lemma implies c(r_2, a(R_1)) is an open neighbourhood of r_2. Hence a(R_1) \cap c(r_2, a(R_1)) \not= \emptyset as we assumed that r_2 was a point of the closure of a(R_1). Using the inverse of R_2 and R_1 we see this means c_2(a(R_1), a(R_1)) contains r_2. As c_2(a(R_1), a(R_1)) \subset a(c_1(R_1, R_1)) = a(R_1) we conclude r_2 \in a(R_1) as desired. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.