Example 35.29.1. Consider the property $\mathcal{P}$ of morphisms of schemes defined by the rule $\mathcal{P}(X \to Y) =$“$Y$ is locally Noetherian”. The reader can verify that this is étale local on the source and étale local on the target (omitted, see Lemma 35.13.1). But it is not true that if $f : X \to Y$ has $\mathcal{P}$ and $g : Y \to Z$ is étale, then $g \circ f$ has $\mathcal{P}$. Namely, $f$ could be the identity on $Y$ and $g$ could be an open immersion of a locally Noetherian scheme $Y$ into a non locally Noetherian scheme $Z$.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).