The Stacks project

Example 35.32.2. Consider the property $\mathcal{P}$ of morphisms of schemes defined by the rule $\mathcal{P}(f : X \to Y) = $“for every $y \in Y$ which is a specialization of some $f(x)$, $x \in X$ the local ring $\mathcal{O}_{Y, y}$ is Noetherian”. Let us verify that this is étale local on the source and étale local on the target. We will freely use Schemes, Lemma 26.13.2.

Local on the target: Let $\{ g_ i : Y_ i \to Y\} $ be an étale covering. Let $f_ i : X_ i \to Y_ i$ be the base change of $f$, and denote $h_ i : X_ i \to X$ the projection. Assume $\mathcal{P}(f)$. Let $f(x_ i) \leadsto y_ i$ be a specialization. Then $f(h_ i(x_ i)) \leadsto g_ i(y_ i)$ so $\mathcal{P}(f)$ implies $\mathcal{O}_{Y, g_ i(y_ i)}$ is Noetherian. Also $\mathcal{O}_{Y, g_ i(y_ i)} \to \mathcal{O}_{Y_ i, y_ i}$ is a localization of an étale ring map. Hence $\mathcal{O}_{Y_ i, y_ i}$ is Noetherian by Algebra, Lemma 10.31.1. Conversely, assume $\mathcal{P}(f_ i)$ for all $i$. Let $f(x) \leadsto y$ be a specialization. Choose an $i$ and $y_ i \in Y_ i$ mapping to $y$. Since $x$ can be viewed as a point of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}_{Y, y}) \times _ Y X$ and $\mathcal{O}_{Y, y} \to \mathcal{O}_{Y_ i, y_ i}$ is faithfully flat, there exists a point $x_ i \in \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}_{Y_ i, y_ i}) \times _ Y X$ mapping to $x$. Then $x_ i \in X_ i$, and $f_ i(x_ i)$ specializes to $y_ i$. Thus we see that $\mathcal{O}_{Y_ i, y_ i}$ is Noetherian by $\mathcal{P}(f_ i)$ which implies that $\mathcal{O}_{Y, y}$ is Noetherian by Algebra, Lemma 10.164.1.

Local on the source: Let $\{ h_ i : X_ i \to X\} $ be an étale covering. Let $f_ i : X_ i \to Y$ be the composition $f \circ h_ i$. Assume $\mathcal{P}(f)$. Let $f(x_ i) \leadsto y$ be a specialization. Then $f(h_ i(x_ i)) \leadsto y$ so $\mathcal{P}(f)$ implies $\mathcal{O}_{Y, y}$ is Noetherian. Thus $\mathcal{P}(f_ i)$ holds. Conversely, assume $\mathcal{P}(f_ i)$ for all $i$. Let $f(x) \leadsto y$ be a specialization. Choose an $i$ and $x_ i \in X_ i$ mapping to $x$. Then $y$ is a specialization of $f_ i(x_ i) = f(x)$. Hence $\mathcal{P}(f_ i)$ implies $\mathcal{O}_{Y, y}$ is Noetherian as desired.

We claim that there exists a commutative diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ U \ar[d]_ a \ar[r]_ h & V \ar[d]^ b \\ X \ar[r]^ f & Y } \]

with surjective étale vertical arrows, such that $h$ has $\mathcal{P}$ and $f$ does not have $\mathcal{P}$. Namely, let

\[ Y = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}\Big( \mathbf{C}[x_ n; n \in \mathbf{Z}]/(x_ n x_ m; n \not= m) \Big) \]

and let $X \subset Y$ be the open subscheme which is the complement of the point all of whose coordinates $x_ n = 0$. Let $U = X$, let $V = X \amalg Y$, let $a, b$ the obvious map, and let $h : U \to V$ be the inclusion of $U = X$ into the first summand of $V$. The claim above holds because $U$ is locally Noetherian, but $Y$ is not.

Comments (0)

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 04QY. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.