Lemma 80.11.5. Assume B \to S and (U, R, s, t, c) are as in Groupoids in Spaces, Definition 78.20.1 (1). For any scheme T over S and objects x, y of [U/R] over T the sheaf \mathit{Isom}(x, y) on (\mathit{Sch}/T)_{fppf} is an algebraic space.
Proof. By Groupoids in Spaces, Lemma 78.22.3 there exists an fppf covering \{ T_ i \to T\} _{i \in I} such that \mathit{Isom}(x, y)|_{(\mathit{Sch}/T_ i)_{fppf}} is an algebraic space for each i. By Spaces, Lemma 65.16.4 this means that each F_ i = h_{S_ i} \times \mathit{Isom}(x, y) is an algebraic space. Thus to prove the lemma we only have to verify the set theoretic condition that \coprod F_ i is an algebraic space of Lemma 80.11.1 above to conclude. To do this we use Spaces, Lemma 65.8.4 which requires showing that I and the F_ i are not “too large”. We suggest the reader skip the rest of the proof.
Choose U' \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf} and a surjective étale morphism U' \to U. Let R' be the restriction of R to U'. Since [U/R] = [U'/R'] we may, after replacing U by U', assume that U is a scheme. (This step is here so that the fibre products below are over a scheme.)
Note that if we refine the covering \{ T_ i \to T\} then it remains true that each F_ i is an algebraic space. Hence we may assume that each T_ i is affine. Since T_ i \to T is locally of finite presentation, this then implies that \text{size}(T_ i) \leq \text{size}(T), see Sets, Lemma 3.9.7. We may also assume that the cardinality of the index set I is at most the cardinality of the set of points of T since to get a covering it suffices to check that each point of T is in the image. Hence |I| \leq \text{size}(T). Choose W \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits ((\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}) and a surjective étale morphism W \to R. Note that in the proof of Groupoids in Spaces, Lemma 78.22.3 we showed that F_ i is representable by T_ i \times _{(y_ i, x_ i), U \times _ B U} R for some x_ i, y_ i : T_ i \to U. Hence now we see that V_ i = T_ i \times _{(y_ i, x_ i), U \times _ B U} W is a scheme which comes with an étale surjection V_ i \to F_ i. By Sets, Lemma 3.9.6 we see that
Hence, by Sets, Lemma 3.9.5 we conclude that
Hence we conclude by our construction of \mathit{Sch} that \coprod _{i \in I} V_ i is isomorphic to an object V of (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}. This verifies the hypothesis of Spaces, Lemma 65.8.4 and we win. \square
Comments (0)