Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 4.27.2. Let \mathcal{C} be a category and let S be a left multiplicative system.

  1. The relation on pairs defined above is an equivalence relation.

  2. The composition rule given above is well defined on equivalence classes.

  3. Composition is associative (and the identity morphisms satisfy the identity axioms), and hence S^{-1}\mathcal{C} is a category.

Proof. Proof of (1). Let us say two pairs p_1 = (f_1 : X \to Y_1, s_1 : Y \to Y_1) and p_2 = (f_2 : X \to Y_2, s_2 : Y \to Y_2) are elementary equivalent if there exists a morphism a : Y_1 \to Y_2 of \mathcal{C} such that a \circ f_1 = f_2 and a \circ s_1 = s_2. Diagram:

\xymatrix{ X \ar@{=}[d] \ar[r]_{f_1} & Y_1 \ar[d]^ a & Y \ar[l]^{s_1} \ar@{=}[d] \\ X \ar[r]^{f_2} & Y_2 & Y \ar[l]_{s_2} }

Let us denote this property by saying p_1Ep_2. Note that pEp and aEb, bEc \Rightarrow aEc. (Despite its name, E is not an equivalence relation.) Part (1) claims that the relation p \sim p' \Leftrightarrow \exists q: pEq \wedge p'Eq (where q is supposed to be a pair satisfying the same conditions as p and p') is an equivalence relation. A simple formal argument, using the properties of E above, shows that it suffices to prove p_3Ep_1, p_3Ep_2 \Rightarrow p_1 \sim p_2. Thus suppose that we are given a commutative diagram

\xymatrix{ & Y_1 & \\ X \ar[ru]^{f_1} \ar[r]^{f_3} \ar[rd]_{f_2} & Y_3 \ar[u]_{a_{31}} \ar[d]^{a_{32}} & Y \ar[lu]_{s_1} \ar[l]_{s_3} \ar[ld]^{s_2} \\ & Y_2 & }

with s_ i \in S. First we apply LMS2 to get a commutative diagram

\xymatrix{ Y \ar[d]_{s_1} \ar[r]_{s_2} & Y_2 \ar@{..>}[d]^{a_{24}} \\ Y_1 \ar@{..>}[r]^{a_{14}} & Y_4 }

with a_{24} \in S. Then, we have

a_{14} \circ a_{31} \circ s_3 = a_{14} \circ s_1 = a_{24} \circ s_2 = a_{24} \circ a_{32} \circ s_3.

Hence, by LMS3, there exists a morphism s_{44} : Y_4 \to Y'_4 such that s_{44} \in S and s_{44} \circ a_{14} \circ a_{31} = s_{44} \circ a_{24} \circ a_{32}. Hence, after replacing Y_4, a_{14} and a_{24} by Y'_4, s_{44} \circ a_{14} and s_{44} \circ a_{24}, we may assume that a_{14} \circ a_{31} = a_{24} \circ a_{32} (and we still have a_{24} \in S and a_{14} \circ s_1 = a_{24} \circ s_2). Set

f_4 = a_{14} \circ f_1 = a_{14} \circ a_{31} \circ f_3 = a_{24} \circ a_{32} \circ f_3 = a_{24} \circ f_2

and s_4 = a_{14} \circ s_1 = a_{24} \circ s_2. Then, the diagram

\xymatrix{ X \ar@{=}[d] \ar[r]_{f_1} & Y_1 \ar[d]^{a_{14}} & Y \ar[l]^{s_1} \ar@{=}[d] \\ X \ar[r]^{f_4} & Y_4 & Y \ar[l]_{s_4} }

commutes, and we have s_4 \in S (by LMS1). Thus, p_1 E p_4, where p_4 = (f_4, s_4). Similarly, p_2 E p_4. Combining these, we find p_1 \sim p_2.

Proof of (2). Let p = (f : X \to Y', s : Y \to Y') and q = (g : Y \to Z', t : Z \to Z') be pairs as in the definition of composition above. To compose we choose a diagram

\xymatrix{ Y \ar[d]_ s \ar[r]_ g & Z' \ar[d]^{u_2} \\ Y' \ar[r]^{h_2} & Z_2 }

with u_2 \in S. We first show that the equivalence class of the pair r_2 = (h_2 \circ f : X \to Z_2, u_2 \circ t : Z \to Z_2) is independent of the choice of (Z_2, h_2, u_2). Namely, suppose that (Z_3, h_3, u_3) is another choice with corresponding composition r_3 = (h_3 \circ f : X \to Z_3, u_3 \circ t : Z \to Z_3). Then by LMS2 we can choose a diagram

\xymatrix{ Z' \ar[d]_{u_2} \ar[r]_{u_3} & Z_3 \ar[d]^{u_{34}} \\ Z_2 \ar[r]^{h_{24}} & Z_4 }

with u_{34} \in S. We have h_2 \circ s = u_2 \circ g and similarly h_3 \circ s = u_3 \circ g. Now,

u_{34} \circ h_3 \circ s = u_{34} \circ u_3 \circ g = h_{24} \circ u_2 \circ g = h_{24} \circ h_2 \circ s.

Hence, LMS3 shows that there exist a Z'_4 and an s_{44} : Z_4 \to Z'_4 such that s_{44} \circ u_{34} \circ h_3 = s_{44} \circ h_{24} \circ h_2. Replacing Z_4, h_{24} and u_{34} by Z'_4, s_{44} \circ h_{24} and s_{44} \circ u_{34}, we may assume that u_{34} \circ h_3 = h_{24} \circ h_2. Meanwhile, the relations u_{34} \circ u_3 = h_{24} \circ u_2 and u_{34} \in S continue to hold. We can now set h_4 = u_{34} \circ h_3 = h_{24} \circ h_2 and u_4 = u_{34} \circ u_3 = h_{24} \circ u_2. Then, we have a commutative diagram

\xymatrix{ X \ar@{=}[d] \ar[r]_{h_2\circ f} & Z_2 \ar[d]^{h_{24}} & Z \ar[l]^{u_2 \circ t} \ar@{=}[d] \\ X \ar@{=}[d] \ar[r]^{h_4\circ f} & Z_4 & Z \ar@{=}[d] \ar[l]_{u_4 \circ t} \\ X \ar[r]^{h_3 \circ f} & Z_3 \ar[u]^{u_{34}} & Z \ar[l]_{u_3 \circ t} }

Hence we obtain a pair r_4 = (h_4 \circ f : X \to Z_4, u_4 \circ t : Z \to Z_4) and the above diagram shows that we have r_2Er_4 and r_3Er_4, whence r_2 \sim r_3, as desired. Thus it now makes sense to define p \circ q as the equivalence class of all possible pairs r obtained as above.

To finish the proof of (2) we have to show that given pairs p_1, p_2, q such that p_1Ep_2 then p_1 \circ q = p_2 \circ q and q \circ p_1 = q \circ p_2 whenever the compositions make sense. To do this, write p_1 = (f_1 : X \to Y_1, s_1 : Y \to Y_1) and p_2 = (f_2 : X \to Y_2, s_2 : Y \to Y_2) and let a : Y_1 \to Y_2 be a morphism of \mathcal{C} such that f_2 = a \circ f_1 and s_2 = a \circ s_1. First assume that q = (g : Y \to Z', t : Z \to Z'). In this case choose a commutative diagram as the one on the left

\vcenter { \xymatrix{ Y \ar[d]_{s_2} \ar[r]^ g & Z' \ar[d]^ u \\ Y_2 \ar[r]^ h & Z'' } } \quad \Rightarrow \quad \vcenter { \xymatrix{ Y \ar[d]_{s_1} \ar[r]^ g & Z' \ar[d]^ u \\ Y_1 \ar[r]^{h \circ a} & Z'' } }

(with u \in S), which implies the diagram on the right is commutative as well. Using these diagrams we see that both compositions q \circ p_1 and q \circ p_2 are the equivalence class of (h \circ a \circ f_1 : X \to Z'', u \circ t : Z \to Z''). Thus q \circ p_1 = q \circ p_2. The proof of the other case, in which we have to show p_1 \circ q = p_2 \circ q, is omitted. (It is similar to the case we did.)

Proof of (3). We have to prove associativity of composition. Consider a solid diagram

\xymatrix{ & & & Z \ar[d] \\ & & Y \ar[d] \ar[r] & Z' \ar@{..>}[d] \\ & X \ar[d] \ar[r] & Y' \ar@{..>}[d] \ar@{..>}[r] & Z'' \ar@{..>}[d] \\ W \ar[r] & X' \ar@{..>}[r] & Y'' \ar@{..>}[r] & Z''' }

(whose vertical arrows belong to S) which gives rise to three composable pairs. Using LMS2 we can choose the dotted arrows making the squares commutative and such that the vertical arrows are in S. Then it is clear that the composition of the three pairs is the equivalence class of the pair (W \to Z''', Z \to Z''') gotten by composing the horizontal arrows on the bottom row and the vertical arrows on the right column.

We leave it to the reader to check the identity axioms. \square


Comments (2)

Comment #322 by arp on

Typos: 1. In the sentence, "A simple formal argument, using the properties of E above shows that it suffices to prove "

Comment #323 by arp on

Hmm something went wrong the first time I posted this.

Typos:

  1. In the sentence, "A simple formal argument, using the properties of E above shows that it suffices to prove ", I think it should say .

  2. In the sentence, "Then we have ," I think the two occurrences of should be replaced with .

  3. In the sentence, "Hence after replacing by , by , and by we may assume that ", I think it should be " by " in place of " by ".

  4. This isn't a typo, but it makes more sense to use instead of in the big diagram at the end of the proof (for associativity of composition).

There are also:

  • 23 comment(s) on Section 4.27: Localization in categories

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.