Lemma 78.25.3. Notation and assumption as in Lemma 78.21.1. Assume that
is cartesian. Then
is a $2$-fibre product square.
Lemma 78.25.3. Notation and assumption as in Lemma 78.21.1. Assume that
is cartesian. Then
is a $2$-fibre product square.
Proof. Applying the inverse isomorphisms $i : R \to R$ and $i' : R' \to R'$ to the (first) cartesian diagram of the statement of the lemma we see that
is cartesian as well. By Lemma 78.21.2 we have a $2$-fibre square
where $U'' = U \times _{f, U', t'} R'$ and $R'' = R \times _{f \circ s, U', t'} R'$. By the above we see that $(t, f) : R \to U''$ is an isomorphism, and that
Explicitly the isomorphism $R \times _{s, U, t} R \to R''$ is given by the rule $(r_0, r_1) \mapsto (r_0, f(r_1))$. Moreover, $s'', t'', c''$ translate into the maps
and
Precomposing with the isomorphism
we see that $t''$ and $s''$ turn into $\text{pr}_0$ and $\text{pr}_1$ and that $c''$ turns into $\text{pr}_{02} : R \times _{s, U, s} R \times _{s, U, s} R \to R \times _{s, U, s} R$. Hence we see that there is an isomorphism $[U''/R''] \cong [R/R \times _{s, U, s} R]$ where as a groupoid in algebraic spaces $(R, R \times _{s, U, s} R, s'', t'', c'')$ is the restriction of the trivial groupoid $(U, U, \text{id}, \text{id}, \text{id})$ via $s : R \to U$. Since $s : R \to U$ is a surjection of fppf sheaves (as it has a right inverse) the morphism
is an equivalence by Lemma 78.25.2. This proves the lemma. $\square$
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$
). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)