The Stacks project

\begin{equation*} \DeclareMathOperator\Coim{Coim} \DeclareMathOperator\Coker{Coker} \DeclareMathOperator\Ext{Ext} \DeclareMathOperator\Hom{Hom} \DeclareMathOperator\Im{Im} \DeclareMathOperator\Ker{Ker} \DeclareMathOperator\Mor{Mor} \DeclareMathOperator\Ob{Ob} \DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafExt{\mathcal{E}\mathit{xt}} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafHom{\mathcal{H}\mathit{om}} \DeclareMathOperator\Spec{Spec} \newcommand\colim{\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\lim{\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Qcoh{\mathit{Qcoh}} \newcommand\Sch{\mathit{Sch}} \newcommand\QCohstack{\mathcal{QC}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Cohstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Spacesstack{\mathcal{S}\!\mathit{paces}} \newcommand\Quotfunctor{\mathrm{Quot}} \newcommand\Hilbfunctor{\mathrm{Hilb}} \newcommand\Curvesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{urves}} \newcommand\Polarizedstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{olarized}} \newcommand\Complexesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{omplexes}} \newcommand\Pic{\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Picardstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{ic}} \newcommand\Picardfunctor{\mathrm{Pic}} \newcommand\Deformationcategory{\mathcal{D}\!\mathit{ef}} \end{equation*}

Being reduced is invariant under blowup

Lemma 10.69.6. If $R$ is reduced then every (affine) blowup algebra of $R$ is reduced.

Proof. Let $I \subset R$ be an ideal and $a \in I$. Suppose $x/a^ n$ with $x \in I^ n$ is a nilpotent element of $R[\frac{I}{a}]$. Then $(x/a^ n)^ m = 0$. Hence $a^ N x^ m = 0$ in $R$ for some $N \geq 0$. After increasing $N$ if necessary we may assume $N = me$ for some $e \geq 0$. Then $(a^ e x)^ m = 0$ and since $R$ is reduced we find $a^ e x = 0$. This means that $x/a^ n = 0$ in $R[\frac{I}{a}]$. $\square$


Comments (2)

Comment #845 by on

Suggested slogan: Every (affine) blowup algebra of a reduced ring is reduced.

Comment #3589 by slogan_bot on

Suggested slogan: Being reduced is invariant under blowup

(Also: for Noetherian rings one could disect this into both (R) and (S) being invariant individually, if this is not already in the Stacks Project.)

There are also:

  • 1 comment(s) on Section 10.69: Blow up algebras

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 052S. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.