Example 10.82.6. Non-split and non-flat universally exact sequences.
In spite of Lemma 10.82.4, it is possible to have a short exact sequence of R-modules
0 \to M_1 \to M_2 \to M_3 \to 0that is universally exact but non-split. For instance, take R = \mathbf{Z}, let M_1 = \bigoplus _{n=1}^{\infty } \mathbf{Z}, let M_{2} = \prod _{n = 1}^{\infty } \mathbf{Z}, and let M_{3} be the cokernel of the inclusion M_1 \to M_2. Then M_1, M_2, M_3 are all flat since they are torsion-free (More on Algebra, Lemma 15.22.11), so by Lemma 10.82.5,
0 \to M_1 \to M_2 \to M_3 \to 0is universally exact. However there can be no section s: M_3 \to M_2. In fact, if x is the image of (2, 2^2, 2^3, \ldots ) \in M_2 in M_3, then any module map s: M_3 \to M_2 must kill x. This is because x \in 2^ n M_3 for any n \geq 1, hence s(x) is divisible by 2^ n for all n \geq 1 and so must be 0.
In spite of Lemma 10.82.5, it is possible to have a short exact sequence of R-modules
0 \to M_1 \to M_2 \to M_3 \to 0that is universally exact but with M_1, M_2, M_3 all non-flat. In fact if M is any non-flat module, just take the split exact sequence
0 \to M \to M \oplus M \to M \to 0.For instance over R = \mathbf{Z}, take M to be any torsion module.
Taking the direct sum of an exact sequence as in (1) with one as in (2), we get a short exact sequence of R-modules
0 \to M_1 \to M_2 \to M_3 \to 0that is universally exact, non-split, and such that M_1, M_2, M_3 are all non-flat.
Comments (1)
Comment #1400 by Fred Rohrer on
There are also: