The Stacks project

Definition 10.86.1. Let $(A_ i, \varphi _{ji})$ be a directed inverse system of sets over $I$. Then we say $(A_ i, \varphi _{ji})$ is Mittag-Leffler if for each $i \in I$, the family $\varphi _{ji}(A_ j) \subset A_ i$ for $j \geq i$ stabilizes. Explicitly, this means that for each $i \in I$, there exists $j \geq i$ such that for $k \geq j$ we have $\varphi _{ki}(A_ k) = \varphi _{ji}( A_ j)$. If $(A_ i, \varphi _{ji})$ is a directed inverse system of modules over a ring $R$, we say that it is Mittag-Leffler if the underlying inverse system of sets is Mittag-Leffler.


Comments (2)

Comment #2970 by on

(1) Replace \it{Mittag-Leffler inverse system} by \it{Mittag-Leffler}. (2) (cf. Comment 2969) "the decreasing family ... stabilizes" seems a bit confusing. Maybe "the decreasingly directed family ... of subsets (or submodules) of attends its infimum"?

There are also:

  • 4 comment(s) on Section 10.86: Mittag-Leffler systems

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0595. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.