Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 10.86.3. Let (A_ i, \varphi _{ji}) be a directed inverse system over I. Suppose I is countable. If (A_ i, \varphi _{ji}) is Mittag-Leffler and the A_ i are nonempty, then \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits A_ i is nonempty.

Proof. Let i_1, i_2, i_3, \ldots be an enumeration of the elements of I. Define inductively a sequence of elements j_ n \in I for n = 1, 2, 3, \ldots by the conditions: j_1 = i_1, and j_ n \geq i_ n and j_ n \geq j_ m for m < n. Then the sequence j_ n is increasing and forms a cofinal subset of I. Hence we may assume I =\{ 1, 2, 3, \ldots \} . So by Example 10.86.2 we are reduced to showing that the limit of an inverse system of nonempty sets with surjective maps indexed by the positive integers is nonempty. This is obvious. \square


Comments (1)

Comment #9894 by Laurent Moret-Bailly on

End of proof: the claim is "obvious" to the same extent as the axiom of choice; in fact it is exactly the "dependent choice axiom".

There are also:

  • 4 comment(s) on Section 10.86: Mittag-Leffler systems

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.