The Stacks project

10.44 Separable extensions, continued

In this section we continue the discussion started in Section 10.42.

Lemma 10.44.1. Let $k$ be a field of characteristic $p > 1$. Let $K/k$ be a field extension generated by $x_1, \ldots , x_{n + 1} \in K$ such that

  1. $\{ x_1, \ldots , x_ n\} $ is a transcendence base of $K/k$,

  2. for every $k$-linearly independent subset $\{ a_1, \ldots , a_ m\} $ of $K$ the set $\{ a^ p_1, \ldots , a_ m^ p\} $ is $k$-linearly independent.

Then there is $1 \leq j \leq n+1$ such that $\{ x_1, \ldots , \widehat{x}_ j, \ldots , x_{n+1}\} $ is a separating transcendence base for $K / k$.

Proof. By assumption $x_{n + 1}$ is algebraic over $k(x_1, \ldots , x_ n)$ so there exists a non-zero polynomial $F \in k[X_1, \ldots , X_{n + 1}]$ such that $F(x_1, \ldots , x_{n+1}) = 0$. Choose $F$ of minimal total degree. Then $F$ is irreducible, because at least one irreducible factor must also have the same property.

We claim that, for some $i$, not all powers of $X_ i$ appearing in $F$ are multiples of $p$. Suppose for a contradiction that all the exponents appearing in $F$ were multiples of $p$, then the set

\[ \{ x_1^{\alpha _1} \ldots x^{\alpha _{n+1}}_{n+1} \mid \lambda _\alpha \neq 0\} \subset K \]

is $k$-linearly dependent where $\lambda _\alpha $ are the coefficients of $F$. By assumption (2) we conclude the set

\[ \{ x_1^{\alpha _1 / p} \ldots x^{\alpha _{n+1} / p}_{n+1} \mid \lambda _\alpha \neq 0 \} \]

is also $k$-linearly dependent, contradicting minimality of $\deg (F)$.

Choose $i$ for which a non-$p$th power of $X_ i$ appears in $F$. Then we see that $x_ i$ is algebraic over $L = k(x_1, \ldots , x_{i - 1}, x_{i + 1}, \ldots , x_{n+1})$. By Fields, Lemma 9.26.3 we see that $x_1, \ldots , x_{i - 1}, x_{i + 1}, \ldots , x_{n+1}$ is a transcendence base of $K/k$. Thus $L$ is the fraction field of the polynomial ring over $k$ in $x_1, \ldots , x_{i - 1}, x_{i + 1}, \ldots , x_{n + 1}$. By Gauss' Lemma we conclude that

\[ P(T) = F(x_1, \ldots , x_{i - 1}, T, x_{i + 1}, \ldots , x_{n + 1}) \in L[T] \]

is irreducible. By construction $P(T)$ is not contained in $L[T^ p]$. Hence $K/L$ is separable as required. $\square$

Let $p$ be a prime number and let $k$ be a field of characteristic $p$. In this case we write $k^{1/p}$ for the extension of $k$ gotten by adjoining $p$th roots of all the elements of $k$ to $k$. (In other words it is the subfield of an algebraic closure of $k$ generated by the $p$th roots of elements of $k$.)

Lemma 10.44.2. Let $k$ be a field of characteristic $p > 0$. Let $K/k$ be a field extension. The following are equivalent:

  1. $K$ is separable over $k$,

  2. for every $k$-linearly independent subset $\{ a_1, \ldots , a_ m\} $ of $K$ the set $\{ a^ p_1, \ldots , a_ m^ p\} $ is $k$-linearly independent,

  3. the ring $K \otimes _ k k^{1/p}$ is reduced, and

  4. $K$ is geometrically reduced over $k$.

Proof. The implication (1) $\Rightarrow $ (4) follows from Lemma 10.43.6. The implication (4) $\Rightarrow $ (3) is immediate.

Assume (3). Consider the ring homomorphism $m : K \otimes _ k k^{1/p} \rightarrow K$ given by

\[ \lambda \otimes \mu \rightarrow \lambda ^ p \mu ^ p \]

Note that $x^ p = m(x) \otimes 1$ for all $x \in K \otimes _ k k^{1/p}$. Since $K \otimes _ k k^{1/p}$ is reduced we see $m$ is injective. If $\{ a_1, \ldots , a_ m\} \subset K$ is $k$-linearly independent, then $\{ a_1 \otimes 1, \ldots , a_ m \otimes 1\} $ is $k^{1/p}$-linearly independent. By injectivity of $m$ we deduce that no nontrivial $k$-linear combination of $a_1^ p, \ldots , a_ m^ p$ is is zero. Hence (3) implies (2).

Assume (2). To prove (1) we may assume that $K$ is finitely generated over $k$ and we have to prove that $K$ is separably generated over $k$. Let $\{ x_1, \ldots , x_ d\} $ be a transcendence base of $K/k$. By Fields, Lemma 9.8.6 we have $[K : K'] < \infty $ where $K' = k(x_1, \ldots , x_ d)$. Choose the transcendence base such that the degree of inseparability $[K : K']_ i$ is minimal. If $K / K'$ is separable then we win. Assume this is not the case to get a contradiction. Then there exists $x_{d + 1} \in K$ which is not separable over $K'$, and in particular $[K'(x_{d+1}) : K']_ i > 1$. Then by Lemma 10.44.1 there is $1 \leq j \leq n + 1$ such that $K'' = k(x_1, \ldots , \widehat{x}_ j, \ldots , x_{d+1})$ satisfies $[K'(x_{d+1}) : K'']_ i = 1$. By multiplicativity $[K : K'']_ i < [K : K']_ i$ and we obtain the contradiction. $\square$

In the following lemma we will use the notion of the perfect closure which is defined in Definition 10.45.5.

Lemma 10.44.4. Let $k$ be a field. Let $S$ be a $k$-algebra. The following are equivalent:

  1. $k' \otimes _ k S$ is reduced for every finite purely inseparable extension $k'$ of $k$,

  2. $k^{1/p} \otimes _ k S$ is reduced,

  3. $k^{perf} \otimes _ k S$ is reduced, where $k^{perf}$ is the perfect closure of $k$,

  4. $\overline{k} \otimes _ k S$ is reduced, where $\overline{k}$ is the algebraic closure of $k$, and

  5. $S$ is geometrically reduced over $k$.

Proof. Note that any finite purely inseparable extension $k'/k$ embeds in $k^{perf}$. Moreover, $k^{1/p}$ embeds into $k^{perf}$ which embeds into $\overline{k}$. Thus it is clear that (5) $\Rightarrow $ (4) $\Rightarrow $ (3) $\Rightarrow $ (2) and that (3) $\Rightarrow $ (1).

We prove that (1) $\Rightarrow $ (5). Assume $k' \otimes _ k S$ is reduced for every finite purely inseparable extension $k'$ of $k$. Let $K/k$ be an extension of fields. We have to show that $K \otimes _ k S$ is reduced. By Lemma 10.43.4 we reduce to the case where $K/k$ is a finitely generated field extension. Choose a diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ K \ar[r] & K' \\ k \ar[u] \ar[r] & k' \ar[u] } \]

as in Lemma 10.42.4. By assumption $k' \otimes _ k S$ is reduced. By Lemma 10.43.6 it follows that $K' \otimes _ k S$ is reduced. Hence we conclude that $K \otimes _ k S$ is reduced as desired.

Finally we prove that (2) $\Rightarrow $ (5). Assume $k^{1/p} \otimes _ k S$ is reduced. Then $S$ is reduced. Moreover, for each localization $S_{\mathfrak p}$ at a minimal prime $\mathfrak p$, the ring $k^{1/p}\otimes _ k S_{\mathfrak p}$ is a localization of $k^{1/p} \otimes _ k S$ hence is reduced. But $S_{\mathfrak p}$ is a field by Lemma 10.25.1, hence $S_{\mathfrak p}$ is geometrically reduced by Lemma 10.44.2. It follows from Lemma 10.43.7 that $S$ is geometrically reduced. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 05DT. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.