The Stacks project

Lemma 38.10.9. Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism which is locally of finite presentation. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module of finite type. If $x \in X$ and $\mathcal{F}$ is flat at $x$ over $S$, then $\mathcal{F}_ x$ is an $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$-module of finite presentation.

Proof. Let $s = f(x)$. By Proposition 38.10.3 there exists an elementary ├ętale neighbourhood $(S', s') \to (S, s)$ such that the pullback of $\mathcal{F}$ to $X \times _ S \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}_{S', s'})$ is of finite presentation in a neighbourhood of the point $x' \in X_{s'} = X_ s$ corresponding to $x$. The ring map

\[ \mathcal{O}_{X, x} \longrightarrow \mathcal{O}_{X \times _ S \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}_{S', s'}), x'} = \mathcal{O}_{X \times _ S S', x'} \]

is flat and local as a localization of an ├ętale ring map. Hence $\mathcal{F}_ x$ is of finite presentation over $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ by descent, see Algebra, Lemma 10.83.2 (and also that a flat local ring map is faithfully flat, see Algebra, Lemma 10.39.17). $\square$


Comments (2)

Comment #8801 by JJ on

Shouldn't this work just as well for a morphisim locally of finite type?

If is ring map of finite type, is a finitely generated -module, and is a prime of such that is flat over , then take a finite polynomial ring surjecting onto . We still have that is a finite -module, and if is the preimage of in , then is still flat over . So proposition 05I5 guarantees that is finitely presented over . But then is also finitely presented over .

Comment #9285 by on

First, in your argument, I would prefer using Lemma 10.5 (the one we're commenting on) instead of Proposition 38.10.3.

The reason I don't want to add this, is that it is sort of the wrong thing to ask for: one should ask for the module to be "relatively finitely presented" with respect to . But we haven't introduced this notion for local homomorphisms of local rings which are essentially of finite type.

This is alluded to in the discussion following Definition 38.4.1. There it is also mentioned that we'll work around this as needed. So if we ever need what your (short) argument shows, then we'll just insert that argument where needed.

Finally, in case we have Lemma 38.10.10.


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 05I7. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.