The Stacks project

Lemma 66.29.4. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be an algebraic space over $S$. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module. Let $x \in |X|$ be a point and let $\overline{x}$ be a geometric point lying over $x$. Finally, let $\varphi : (U, \overline{u}) \to (X, \overline{x})$ be an ├ętale neighbourhood where $U$ is a scheme. Then

\[ (\varphi ^*\mathcal{F})_ u \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_{U, u}} \mathcal{O}_{X, \overline{x}} = \mathcal{F}_{\overline{x}} \]

where $u \in U$ is the image of $\overline{u}$.

Proof. Note that $\mathcal{O}_{X, \overline{x}} = \mathcal{O}_{U, u}^{sh}$ by Lemma 66.22.1 hence the tensor product makes sense. Moreover, from Definition 66.19.6 it is clear that

\[ \mathcal{F}_{\overline{u}} = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits (\varphi ^*\mathcal{F})_ u \]

where the colimit is over $\varphi : (U, \overline{u}) \to (X, \overline{x})$ as in the lemma. Hence there is a canonical map from left to right in the statement of the lemma. We have a similar colimit description for $\mathcal{O}_{X, \overline{x}}$ and by Lemma 66.29.3 we have

\[ ((\varphi ')^*\mathcal{F})_{u'} = (\varphi ^*\mathcal{F})_ u \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_{U, u}} \mathcal{O}_{U', u'} \]

whenever $(U', \overline{u}') \to (U, \overline{u})$ is a morphism of ├ętale neighbourhoods. To complete the proof we use that $\otimes $ commutes with colimits. $\square$

Comments (0)

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 05VP. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.