Lemma 110.14.1. There exists a local ring $R$ and a regular sequence $x, y, z$ (in the maximal ideal) such that there exists a nonzero element $\delta \in R/zR$ with $x\delta = y\delta = 0$.
110.14 Regular sequences and base change
We are going to construct a ring $R$ with a regular sequence $(x, y, z)$ such that there exists a nonzero element $\delta \in R/zR$ with $x\delta = y\delta = 0$.
To construct our example we first construct a peculiar module $E$ over the ring $k[x, y, z]$ where $k$ is any field. Namely, $E$ will be a push-out as in the following diagram
\[ \xymatrix{ \frac{xk[x, y, z, y^{-1}]}{xyk[x, y, z]} \ar[r] \ar[d]^{z/x} & \frac{k[x, y, z, x^{-1}, y^{-1}]}{yk[x, y, z, x^{-1}]} \ar[r] \ar[d] & \frac{k[x, y, z, x^{-1}, y^{-1}]}{yk[x, y, z, x^{-1}] + xk[x, y, z, y^{-1}]} \ar[d] \\ \frac{k[x, y, z, y^{-1}]}{yzk[x, y, z]} \ar[r] & E \ar[r] & \frac{k[x, y, z, x^{-1}, y^{-1}]}{yk[x, y, z, x^{-1}] + xk[x, y, z, y^{-1}]} } \]
where the rows are short exact sequences (we dropped the outer zeros due to typesetting problems). Another way to describe $E$ is as
\[ E = \{ (f, g) \mid f \in k[x, y, z, x^{-1}, y^{-1}], g \in k[x, y, z, y^{-1}] \} /\sim \]
where $(f, g) \sim (f', g')$ if and only if there exists a $h \in k[x, y, z, y^{-1}]$ such that
\[ f = f' + xh \bmod yk[x, y, z, x^{-1}], \quad g = g' - zh \bmod yzk[x, y, z] \]
We claim: (a) $x : E \to E$ is injective, (b) $y : E/xE \to E/xE$ is injective, (c) $E/(x, y)E = 0$, (d) there exists a nonzero element $\delta \in E/zE$ such that $x\delta = y\delta = 0$.
To prove (a) suppose that $(f, g)$ is a pair that gives rise to an element of $E$ and that $(xf, xg) \sim 0$. Then there exists a $h \in k[x, y, z, y^{-1}]$ such that $xf + xh \in yk[x, y, z, x^{-1}]$ and $xg - zh \in yzk[x, y, z]$. We may assume that $h = \sum a_{i, j, k}x^ iy^ jz^ k$ is a sum of monomials where only $j \leq 0$ occurs. Then $xg - zh \in yzk[x, y, z]$ implies that only $i > 0$ occurs, i.e., $h = xh'$ for some $h' \in k[x, y, z, y^{-1}]$. Then $(f, g) \sim (f + xh', g - zh')$ and we see that we may assume that $g = 0$ and $h = 0$. In this case $xf \in yk[x, y, z, x^{-1}]$ implies $f \in yk[x, y, z, x^{-1}]$ and we see that $(f, g) \sim 0$. Thus $x : E \to E$ is injective.
Since multiplication by $x$ is an isomorphism on $\frac{k[x, y, z, x^{-1}, y^{-1}]}{yk[x, y, z, x^{-1}]}$ we see that $E/xE$ is isomorphic to
\[ \frac{k[x, y, z, y^{-1}]}{ yzk[x, y, z] + xk[x, y, z, y^{-1}] + zk[x, y, z, y^{-1}]} = \frac{k[x, y, z, y^{-1}]}{xk[x, y, z, y^{-1}] + zk[x, y, z, y^{-1}]} \]
and hence multiplication by $y$ is an isomorphism on $E/xE$. This clearly implies (b) and (c).
Let $e \in E$ be the equivalence class of $(1, 0)$. Suppose that $e \in zE$. Then there exist $f \in k[x, y, z, x^{-1}, y^{-1}]$, $g \in k[x, y, z, y^{-1}]$, and $h \in k[x, y, z, y^{-1}]$ such that
\[ 1 + zf + xh \in yk[x, y, z, x^{-1}], \quad 0 + zg - zh \in yzk[x, y, z]. \]
This is impossible: the monomial $1$ cannot occur in $zf$, nor in $xh$. On the other hand, we have $ye = 0$ and $xe = (x, 0) \sim (0, -z) = z(0, -1)$. Hence setting $\delta $ equal to the congruence class of $e$ in $E/zE$ we obtain (d).
Proof. Let $R = k[x, y, z] \oplus E$ where $E$ is the module above considered as a square zero ideal. Then it is clear that $x, y, z$ is a regular sequence in $R$, and that the element $\delta \in E/zE \subset R/zR$ gives an element with the desired properties. To get a local example we may localize $R$ at the maximal ideal $\mathfrak m = (x, y, z, E)$. The sequence $x, y, z$ remains a regular sequence (as localization is exact), and the element $\delta $ remains nonzero as it is supported at $\mathfrak m$. $\square$
Lemma 110.14.2. There exists a local homomorphism of local rings $A \to B$ and a regular sequence $x, y$ in the maximal ideal of $B$ such that $B/(x, y)$ is flat over $A$, but such that the images $\overline{x}, \overline{y}$ of $x, y$ in $B/\mathfrak m_ AB$ do not form a regular sequence, nor even a Koszul-regular sequence.
Proof. Set $A = k[z]_{(z)}$ and let $B = (k[x, y, z] \oplus E)_{(x, y, z, E)}$. Since $x, y, z$ is a regular sequence in $B$, see proof of Lemma 110.14.1, we see that $x, y$ is a regular sequence in $B$ and that $B/(x, y)$ is a torsion free $A$-module, hence flat. On the other hand, there exists a nonzero element $\delta \in B/\mathfrak m_ AB = B/zB$ which is annihilated by $\overline{x}, \overline{y}$. Hence $H_2(K_\bullet (B/\mathfrak m_ AB, \overline{x}, \overline{y})) \not= 0$. Thus $\overline{x}, \overline{y}$ is not Koszul-regular, in particular it is not a regular sequence, see More on Algebra, Lemma 15.30.2. $\square$
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)