The Stacks project

Lemma 15.69.3. Let $M$ be a module over a ring $R$. The following are equivalent

  1. $M$ is a perfect module, and

  2. there exists a resolution

    \[ 0 \to F_ d \to \ldots \to F_1 \to F_0 \to M \to 0 \]

    with each $F_ i$ a finite projective $R$-module.

Proof. Assume (2). Then the complex $E^\bullet $ with $E^{-i} = F_ i$ is quasi-isomorphic to $M[0]$. Hence $M$ is perfect. Conversely, assume (1). By Lemmas 15.69.2 and 15.62.4 we can find resolution $E^\bullet \to M$ with $E^{-i}$ a finite free $R$-module. By Lemma 15.63.2 we see that $F_ d = \mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(E^{d - 1} \to E^ d)$ is flat for some $d$ sufficiently large. By Algebra, Lemma 10.77.2 we see that $F_ d$ is finite projective. Hence

\[ 0 \to F_ d \to E^{-d+1} \to \ldots \to E^0 \to M \to 0 \]

is the desired resolution. $\square$


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 15.69: Perfect complexes

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 066Q. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.