The Stacks project

66.23 Local irreducibility

A point on an algebraic space has a well defined étale local ring, which corresponds to the strict henselization of the local ring in the case of a scheme. In general we cannot see how many irreducible components of a scheme or an algebraic space pass through the given point from the étale local ring. We can only count the number of geometric branches.

Lemma 66.23.1. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be an algebraic space over $S$. Let $x \in |X|$ be a point. The following are equivalent

  1. for any scheme $U$ and étale morphism $a : U \to X$ and $u \in U$ with $a(u) = x$ the local ring $\mathcal{O}_{U, u}$ has a unique minimal prime,

  2. for any scheme $U$ and étale morphism $a : U \to X$ and $u \in U$ with $a(u) = x$ there is a unique irreducible component of $U$ through $u$,

  3. for any scheme $U$ and étale morphism $a : U \to X$ and $u \in U$ with $a(u) = x$ the local ring $\mathcal{O}_{U, u}$ is unibranch,

  4. for any scheme $U$ and étale morphism $a : U \to X$ and $u \in U$ with $a(u) = x$ the local ring $\mathcal{O}_{U, u}$ is geometrically unibranch,

  5. $\mathcal{O}_{X, \overline{x}}$ has a unique minimal prime for any geometric point $\overline{x}$ lying over $x$.

Proof. The equivalence of (1) and (2) follows from the fact that irreducible components of $U$ passing through $u$ are in $1$-$1$ correspondence with minimal primes of the local ring of $U$ at $u$. Let $a : U \to X$ and $u \in U$ be as in (1). Then $\mathcal{O}_{X, \overline{x}}$ is the strict henselization of $\mathcal{O}_{U, u}$ by Lemma 66.22.1. In particular (4) and (5) are equivalent by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.106.5. The equivalence of (2), (3), and (4) follows from More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.36.2. $\square$

Definition 66.23.2. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be an algebraic space over $S$. Let $x \in |X|$. We say that $X$ is geometrically unibranch at $x$ if the equivalent conditions of Lemma 66.23.1 hold. We say that $X$ is geometrically unibranch if $X$ is geometrically unibranch at every $x \in |X|$.

This is consistent with the definition for schemes (Properties, Definition 28.15.1).

Lemma 66.23.3. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be an algebraic space over $S$. Let $x \in |X|$ be a point. Let $n \in \{ 1, 2, \ldots \} $ be an integer. The following are equivalent

  1. for any scheme $U$ and étale morphism $a : U \to X$ and $u \in U$ with $a(u) = x$ the number of minimal primes of the local ring $\mathcal{O}_{U, u}$ is $\leq n$ and for at least one choice of $U, a, u$ it is $n$,

  2. for any scheme $U$ and étale morphism $a : U \to X$ and $u \in U$ with $a(u) = x$ the number irreducible components of $U$ passing through $u$ is $\leq n$ and for at least one choice of $U, a, u$ it is $n$,

  3. for any scheme $U$ and étale morphism $a : U \to X$ and $u \in U$ with $a(u) = x$ the number of branches of $U$ at $u$ is $\leq n$ and for at least one choice of $U, a, u$ it is $n$,

  4. for any scheme $U$ and étale morphism $a : U \to X$ and $u \in U$ with $a(u) = x$ the number of geometric branches of $U$ at $u$ is $n$, and

  5. the number of minimal prime ideals of $\mathcal{O}_{X, \overline{x}}$ is $n$.

Proof. The equivalence of (1) and (2) follows from the fact that irreducible components of $U$ passing through $u$ are in $1$-$1$ correspondence with minimal primes of the local ring of $U$ at $u$. Let $a : U \to X$ and $u \in U$ be as in (1). Then $\mathcal{O}_{X, \overline{x}}$ is the strict henselization of $\mathcal{O}_{U, u}$ by Lemma 66.22.1. Recall that the (geometric) number of branches of $U$ at $u$ is the number of minimal prime ideals of the (strict) henselization of $\mathcal{O}_{U, u}$. In particular (4) and (5) are equivalent. The equivalence of (2), (3), and (4) follows from More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.36.2. $\square$

Definition 66.23.4. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be an algebraic space over $S$. Let $x \in |X|$. The number of geometric branches of $X$ at $x$ is either $n \in \mathbf{N}$ if the equivalent conditions of Lemma 66.23.3 hold, or else $\infty $.


Comments (2)

Comment #397 by Matthew Emerton on

Dear Johan,

I think in line 3, algebraic stack'' should readalgebraic space''.

Cheers,

Matt

Comment #401 by on

Hi! Yes, thanks. I tried to improve the sentence, but I am not sure I succeeded. Here is the change.


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 06DJ. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.