The Stacks project

64.25 Regular algebraic spaces

We have already defined regular algebraic spaces in Section 64.7.

Lemma 64.25.1. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be a locally Noetherian algebraic space over $S$. The following are equivalent

  1. $X$ is regular, and

  2. every étale local ring $\mathcal{O}_{X, \overline{x}}$ is regular.

Proof. Let $U$ be a scheme and let $U \to X$ be a surjective étale morphism. By assumption $U$ is locally Noetherian. Moreover, every étale local ring $\mathcal{O}_{X, \overline{x}}$ is the strict henselization of a local ring on $U$ and conversely, see Lemma 64.22.1. Thus by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.45.10 we see that (2) is equivalent to every local ring of $U$ being regular, i.e., $U$ being a regular scheme (see Properties, Lemma 28.9.2). This equivalent to (1) by Definition 64.7.2. $\square$

We can use Descent, Lemma 35.18.4 to define what it means for an algebraic space $X$ to be regular at a point $x$.

Definition 64.25.2. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be an algebraic space over $S$. Let $x \in |X|$ be a point. We say $X$ is regular at $x$ if $\mathcal{O}_{U, u}$ is a regular local ring for any (equivalently some) pair $(a : U \to X, u)$ consisting of an étale morphism $a : U \to X$ from a scheme to $X$ and a point $u \in U$ with $a(u) = x$.

See Definition 64.7.5, Lemma 64.7.4, and Descent, Lemma 35.18.4.

Lemma 64.25.3. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be an algebraic space over $S$. Let $x \in |X|$ be a point. The following are equivalent

  1. $X$ is regular at $x$, and

  2. the étale local ring $\mathcal{O}_{X, \overline{x}}$ is regular for any (equivalently some) geometric point $\overline{x}$ lying over $x$.

Proof. Let $U$ be a scheme, $u \in U$ a point, and let $a : U \to X$ be an étale morphism mapping $u$ to $x$. For any geometric point $\overline{x}$ of $X$ lying over $x$, the étale local ring $\mathcal{O}_{X, \overline{x}}$ is the strict henselization of a local ring on $U$ at $u$, see Lemma 64.22.1. Thus we conclude by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.45.10. $\square$

Proof. This follows from the definitions and the case of schemes See Properties, Lemma 28.9.4. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 06LP. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.