The Stacks project

Lemma 96.19.2. Generalities on relative Čech complexes.

  1. If

    \[ \xymatrix{ \mathcal{V} \ar[d]_ g \ar[r]_ h & \mathcal{U} \ar[d]^ f \\ \mathcal{Y} \ar[r]^ e & \mathcal{X} } \]

    is $2$-commutative diagram of categories fibred in groupoids over $(\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}$, then there is a morphism $e^{-1}\mathcal{K}^\bullet (f, \mathcal{F}) \to \mathcal{K}^\bullet (g, e^{-1}\mathcal{F})$.

  2. if $h$ and $e$ are equivalences, then the map of (1) is an isomorphism,

  3. if $f, f' : \mathcal{U} \to \mathcal{X}$ are $2$-isomorphic, then the associated relative Čech complexes are isomorphic,

Proof. Literally the same as the proof of Lemma 96.18.1 using the pullback maps of Remark 96.19.1. $\square$


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 96.19: The relative Čech complex

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 06X9. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.