Loading [MathJax]/extensions/tex2jax.js

The Stacks project

Remark 96.19.1. We can define the complex $\mathcal{K}^\bullet (f, \mathcal{F})$ also if $\mathcal{F}$ is a presheaf, only we cannot use the reference to Sites, Section 7.45 to define the pullback maps. To explain the pullback maps, suppose given a commutative diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ \mathcal{V} \ar[rd]_ g \ar[rr]_ h & & \mathcal{U} \ar[ld]^ f \\ & \mathcal{X} } \]

of categories fibred in groupoids over $(\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}$ and a presheaf $\mathcal{G}$ on $\mathcal{U}$ we can define the pullback map $f_*\mathcal{G} \to g_*h^{-1}\mathcal{G}$ as the composition

\[ f_*\mathcal{G} \longrightarrow f_*h_*h^{-1}\mathcal{G} = g_*h^{-1}\mathcal{G} \]

where the map comes from the adjunction map $\mathcal{G} \to h_*h^{-1}\mathcal{G}$. This works because in our situation the functors $h_*$ and $h^{-1}$ are adjoint in presheaves (and agree with their counter parts on sheaves). See Sections 96.3 and 96.4.


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 96.19: The relative Čech complex

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.