The Stacks project

Lemma 13.31.2. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. Let $I^\bullet $ be a complex. The following are equivalent

  1. $I^\bullet $ is K-injective,

  2. for every quasi-isomorphism $M^\bullet \to N^\bullet $ the map

    \[ \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\mathcal{A})}(N^\bullet , I^\bullet ) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\mathcal{A})}(M^\bullet , I^\bullet ) \]

    is bijective, and

  3. for every complex $N^\bullet $ the map

    \[ \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\mathcal{A})}(N^\bullet , I^\bullet ) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{A})}(N^\bullet , I^\bullet ) \]

    is an isomorphism.

Proof. Assume (1). Then (2) holds because the functor $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\mathcal{A})}( - , I^\bullet )$ is cohomological and the cone on a quasi-isomorphism is acyclic.

Assume (2). A morphism $N^\bullet \to I^\bullet $ in $D(\mathcal{A})$ is of the form $fs^{-1} : N^\bullet \to I^\bullet $ where $s : M^\bullet \to N^\bullet $ is a quasi-isomorphism and $f : M^\bullet \to I^\bullet $ is a map. By (2) this corresponds to a unique morphism $N^\bullet \to I^\bullet $ in $K(\mathcal{A})$, i.e., (3) holds.

Assume (3). If $M^\bullet $ is acyclic then $M^\bullet $ is isomorphic to the zero complex in $D(\mathcal{A})$ hence $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{A})}(M^\bullet , I^\bullet ) = 0$, whence $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\mathcal{A})}(M^\bullet , I^\bullet ) = 0$ by (3), i.e., (1) holds. $\square$


Comments (2)

Comment #9467 by on

One could add to the statement:

(4) Any quasi-isomorphism is a homotopy equivalence.

Proof of the equivalence. (2)(4). Precomposition by induces a bijection . This implies that has a unique left inverse in . In a preadditive category, this implies invertibility.

(4)(3). A morphism in is of the form , where and is a quasi-isomorphism. Hence is onto. It is also injective: if is a map in that becomes zero in , then by Homology, Comment #9465 there is a quasi-isomorphism with in . Thus in .

Comment #9855 by on

For the interested reader, I wrote the generalization of this result to arbitrary triangulated categories and I merged it with the list of equivalent definitions of K-injective complex from Lipman [L, 2.3.8], including the proof (I claim no originality over any of this). See [GH, Prop. 2.4].


[GH] —, A Gospel Harmony of Derived Functors https://eliasguisado.wordpress.com/work/

[L] J. Lipman. “Notes on Derived Functors and Grothendieck Duality”. In: Foundations of Grothendieck Duality for Diagrams of Schemes. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, 2009

There are also:

  • 5 comment(s) on Section 13.31: K-injective complexes

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 070I. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.