Lemma 110.56.1. There exists a functor $F : \mathit{Sch}^{opp} \to \textit{Sets}$ which satisfies the sheaf condition for the fpqc topology, has representable diagonal $\Delta : F \to F \times F$, and such that there exists a surjective, flat, universally open, quasi-compact morphism $U \to F$ where $U$ is a scheme, but such that $F$ is not an algebraic space.

## 110.56 Sheaf with quasi-compact flat covering which is not algebraic

Consider the functor $F = (\mathbf{P}^1)^\infty $, i.e., for a scheme $T$ the value $F(T)$ is the set of $f = (f_1, f_2, f_3, \ldots )$ where each $f_ i : T \to \mathbf{P}^1$ is a morphism of schemes. Note that $\mathbf{P}^1$ satisfies the sheaf property for fpqc coverings, see Descent, Lemma 35.13.7. A product of sheaves is a sheaf, so $F$ also satisfies the sheaf property for the fpqc topology. The diagonal of $F$ is representable: if $f : T \to F$ and $g : S \to F$ are morphisms, then $T \times _ F S$ is the scheme theoretic intersection of the closed subschemes $T \times _{f_ i, \mathbf{P}^1, g_ i} S$ inside the scheme $T \times S$. Consider the group scheme $\text{SL}_2$ which comes with a surjective smooth affine morphism $\text{SL}_2 \to \mathbf{P}^1$. Next, consider $U = (\text{SL}_2)^\infty $ with its canonical (product) morphism $U \to F$. Note that $U$ is an affine scheme. We claim the morphism $U \to F$ is flat, surjective, and universally open. Namely, suppose $f : T \to F$ is a morphism. Then $Z = T \times _ F U$ is the infinite fibre product of the schemes $Z_ i = T \times _{f_ i, \mathbf{P}^1} \text{SL}_2$ over $T$. Each of the morphisms $Z_ i \to T$ is surjective smooth and affine which implies that

is a scheme flat and affine over $Z$. A simple limit argument shows that $Z \to T$ is open as well.

On the other hand, we claim that $F$ isn't an algebraic space. Namely, if $F$ where an algebraic space it would be a quasi-compact and separated (by our description of fibre products over $F$) algebraic space. Hence cohomology of quasi-coherent sheaves would vanish above a certain cutoff (see Cohomology of Spaces, Proposition 69.7.2 and remarks preceding it). But clearly by taking the pullback of $\mathcal{O}(-2, -2, \ldots , -2)$ under the projection

(which has a section) we can obtain a quasi-coherent sheaf whose cohomology is nonzero in degree $n$. Altogether we obtain an answer to a question asked by Anton Geraschenko on mathoverflow.

**Proof.**
See discussion above.
$\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)