Lemma 103.3.1. Let $\mathcal{X}$ be an algebraic stack. Notation as in Cohomology of Stacks, Lemmas 102.14.2 and 102.14.4.

1. The functor $g_! : \textit{Ab}(\mathcal{X}_{lisse,{\acute{e}tale}}) \to \textit{Ab}(\mathcal{X}_{\acute{e}tale})$ has a left derived functor

$Lg_! : D(\mathcal{X}_{lisse,{\acute{e}tale}}) \longrightarrow D(\mathcal{X}_{\acute{e}tale})$

which is left adjoint to $g^{-1}$ and such that $g^{-1}Lg_! = \text{id}$.

2. The functor $g_! : \textit{Mod}(\mathcal{X}_{lisse,{\acute{e}tale}}, \mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}_{lisse,{\acute{e}tale}}}) \to \textit{Mod}(\mathcal{X}_{\acute{e}tale}, \mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}})$ has a left derived functor

$Lg_! : D(\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}_{lisse,{\acute{e}tale}}}) \longrightarrow D(\mathcal{X}_{\acute{e}tale}, \mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X})$

which is left adjoint to $g^*$ and such that $g^*Lg_! = \text{id}$.

3. The functor $g_! : \textit{Ab}(\mathcal{X}_{flat,fppf}) \to \textit{Ab}(\mathcal{X}_{fppf})$ has a left derived functor

$Lg_! : D(\mathcal{X}_{flat, fppf}) \longrightarrow D(\mathcal{X}_{fppf})$

which is left adjoint to $g^{-1}$ and such that $g^{-1}Lg_! = \text{id}$.

4. The functor $g_! : \textit{Mod}(\mathcal{X}_{flat,fppf}, \mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}_{flat,fppf}}) \to \textit{Mod}(\mathcal{X}_{fppf}, \mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}})$ has a left derived functor

$Lg_! : D(\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}_{flat, fppf}}) \longrightarrow D(\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X})$

which is left adjoint to $g^*$ and such that $g^*Lg_! = \text{id}$.

Warning: It is not clear (a priori) that $Lg_!$ on modules agrees with $Lg_!$ on abelian sheaves, see Cohomology on Sites, Remark 21.37.3.

Proof. The existence of the functor $Lg_!$ and adjointness to $g^*$ is Cohomology on Sites, Lemma 21.37.2. (For the case of abelian sheaves use the constant sheaf $\mathbf{Z}$ as the structure sheaves.) Moreover, it is computed on a complex $\mathcal{H}^\bullet$ by taking a suitable left resolution $\mathcal{K}^\bullet \to \mathcal{H}^\bullet$ and applying the functor $g_!$ to $\mathcal{K}^\bullet$. Since $g^{-1}g_!\mathcal{K}^\bullet = \mathcal{K}^\bullet$ by Cohomology of Stacks, Lemmas 102.14.4 and 102.14.2 we see that the final assertion holds in each case. $\square$

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 07AS. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.