Here is another fiendishly clever lemma.
Proof.
Choose a presentation
A = R[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]/(f_1, \ldots , f_ m)
and 0 \leq c \leq \min (n, m) such that (16.2.3.3) holds for \pi and such that
16.7.1.1
\begin{equation} \label{smoothing-equation-star} \pi f_{c + j} \in (f_1, \ldots , f_ c) + (f_1, \ldots , f_ m)^2 \end{equation}
for j = 1, \ldots , m - c. Say \rho maps x_ i to the class of r_ i \in R. Then we can replace x_ i by x_ i - r_ i. Hence we may assume \rho (x_ i) = 0 in R/\pi ^4 R. This implies that f_ j(0) \in \pi ^4R and that A \to \Lambda maps x_ i to \pi ^4\lambda _ i for some \lambda _ i \in \Lambda . Write
f_ j = f_ j(0) + \sum \nolimits _{i = 1, \ldots , n} r_{ji} x_ i + \text{h.o.t.}
This implies that the constant term of \partial f_ j/\partial x_ i is r_{ji}. Apply \rho to (16.2.3.3) for \pi and we see that
\pi = \sum \nolimits _{I \subset \{ 1, \ldots , n\} ,\ |I| = c} r_ I \det (r_{ji})_{j = 1, \ldots , c,\ i \in I} \bmod \pi ^4R
for some r_ I \in R. Thus we have
u\pi = \sum \nolimits _{I \subset \{ 1, \ldots , n\} ,\ |I| = c} r_ I \det (r_{ji})_{j = 1, \ldots , c,\ i \in I}
for some u \in 1 + \pi ^3R. By Algebra, Lemma 10.15.5 this implies there exists a n \times c matrix (s_{ik}) such that
u\pi \delta _{jk} = \sum \nolimits _{i = 1, \ldots , n} r_{ji}s_{ik}\quad \text{for all } j, k = 1, \ldots , c
(Kronecker delta). We introduce auxiliary variables v_1, \ldots , v_ c, w_1, \ldots , w_ n and we set
h_ i = x_ i - \pi ^2 \sum \nolimits _{j = 1, \ldots c} s_{ij} v_ j - \pi ^3 w_ i
In the following we will use that
R[x_1, \ldots , x_ n, v_1, \ldots , v_ c, w_1, \ldots , w_ n]/ (h_1, \ldots , h_ n) = R[v_1, \ldots , v_ c, w_1, \ldots , w_ n]
without further mention. In R[x_1, \ldots , x_ n, v_1, \ldots , v_ c, w_1, \ldots , w_ n]/ (h_1, \ldots , h_ n) we have
\begin{align*} f_ j & = f_ j(x_1 - h_1, \ldots , x_ n - h_ n) \\ & = \pi ^2 \sum \nolimits _{k = 1}^ c \left(\sum \nolimits _{i = 1}^ n r_{ji} s_{ik}\right) v_ k + \pi ^3 \sum \nolimits _{i = 1}^ n r_{ji}w_ i \bmod \pi ^4 \\ & = \pi ^3 v_ j + \pi ^3 \sum \nolimits _{i = 1}^ n r_{ji}w_ i \bmod \pi ^4 \end{align*}
for 1 \leq j \leq c. Hence we can choose elements g_ j \in R[v_1, \ldots , v_ c, w_1, \ldots , w_ n] such that g_ j = v_ j + \sum r_{ji}w_ i \bmod \pi and such that f_ j = \pi ^3 g_ j in the R-algebra R[x_1, \ldots , x_ n, v_1, \ldots , v_ c, w_1, \ldots , w_ n]/ (h_1, \ldots , h_ n). We set
B = R[x_1, \ldots , x_ n, v_1, \ldots , v_ c, w_1, \ldots , w_ n]/ (f_1, \ldots , f_ m, h_1, \ldots , h_ n, g_1, \ldots , g_ c).
The map A \to B is clear. We define B \to \Lambda by mapping x_ i \to \pi ^4\lambda _ i, v_ i \mapsto 0, and w_ i \mapsto \pi \lambda _ i. Then it is clear that the elements f_ j and h_ i are mapped to zero in \Lambda . Moreover, it is clear that g_ i is mapped to an element t of \pi \Lambda such that \pi ^3t = 0 (as f_ i = \pi ^3 g_ i modulo the ideal generated by the h's). Hence our assumption that \text{Ann}_\Lambda (\pi ) = \text{Ann}_\Lambda (\pi ^2) implies that t = 0. Thus we are done if we can prove the statement about smoothness.
Note that B_\pi \cong A_\pi [v_1, \ldots , v_ c] because the equations g_ i = 0 are implied by f_ i = 0. Hence B_\pi is smooth over R as A_\pi is smooth over R by the assumption that \pi is strictly standard in A over R, see Lemma 16.2.5.
Set B' = R[v_1, \ldots , v_ c, w_1, \ldots , w_ n]/(g_1, \ldots , g_ c). As g_ i = v_ i + \sum r_{ji}w_ i \bmod \pi we see that B'/\pi B' = R/\pi R[w_1, \ldots , w_ n]. Hence R \to B' is smooth of relative dimension n at every point of V(\pi ) by Algebra, Lemmas 10.136.10 and 10.137.17 (the first lemma shows it is syntomic at those primes, in particular flat, whereupon the second lemma shows it is smooth).
Let \mathfrak q \subset B be a prime with \pi \in \mathfrak q and for some r \in \mathfrak a, r \not\in \mathfrak q. Denote \mathfrak q' = B' \cap \mathfrak q. We claim the surjection B' \to B induces an isomorphism of local rings (B')_{\mathfrak q'} \to B_\mathfrak q. This will conclude the proof of the lemma. Note that B_\mathfrak q is the quotient of (B')_{\mathfrak q'} by the ideal generated by f_{c + j}, j = 1, \ldots , m - c. We observe two things: first the image of f_{c + j} in (B')_{\mathfrak q'} is divisible by \pi ^2 and second the image of \pi f_{c + j} in (B')_{\mathfrak q'} can be written as \sum b_{j_1 j_2} f_{c + j_1}f_{c + j_2} by (16.7.1.1). Thus we see that the image of each \pi f_{c + j} is contained in the ideal generated by the elements \pi ^2 f_{c + j'}. Hence \pi f_{c + j} = 0 in (B')_{\mathfrak q'} as this is a Noetherian local ring, see Algebra, Lemma 10.51.4. As R \to (B')_{\mathfrak q'} is flat we see that
\left(\text{Ann}_ R(\pi ^2)/\text{Ann}_ R(\pi )\right) \otimes _ R (B')_{\mathfrak q'} = \text{Ann}_{(B')_{\mathfrak q'}}(\pi ^2)/\text{Ann}_{(B')_{\mathfrak q'}}(\pi )
Because r \in \mathfrak a is invertible in (B')_{\mathfrak q'} we see that this module is zero. Hence we see that the image of f_{c + j} is zero in (B')_{\mathfrak q'} as desired.
\square
Comments (0)