Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

16.8 Warmup: reduction to a base field

In this section we apply the lemmas in the previous sections to prove that it suffices to prove the main result when the base ring is a field, see Lemma 16.8.4.

Situation 16.8.1. Here R \to \Lambda is a regular ring map of Noetherian rings.

Let R \to \Lambda be as in Situation 16.8.1. We say PT holds for R \to \Lambda if \Lambda is a filtered colimit of smooth R-algebras.

Lemma 16.8.2. Let R_ i \to \Lambda _ i, i = 1, 2 be as in Situation 16.8.1. If PT holds for R_ i \to \Lambda _ i, i = 1, 2, then PT holds for R_1 \times R_2 \to \Lambda _1 \times \Lambda _2.

Proof. Omitted. Hint: A product of filtered colimits is a filtered colimit. \square

Lemma 16.8.3. Let R \to A \to \Lambda be ring maps with A of finite presentation over R. Let S \subset R be a multiplicative set. Let S^{-1}A \to B' \to S^{-1}\Lambda be a factorization with B' smooth over S^{-1}R. Then we can find a factorization A \to B \to \Lambda such that some s \in S maps to an elementary standard element (Definition 16.2.3) in B over R.

Proof. We first apply Lemma 16.3.4 to S^{-1}R \to B'. Thus we may assume B' is standard smooth over S^{-1}R. Write A = R[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]/(g_1, \ldots , g_ t) and say x_ i \mapsto \lambda _ i in \Lambda . We may write B' = S^{-1}R[x_1, \ldots , x_{n + m}]/(f_1, \ldots , f_ c) for some c \geq n where \det (\partial f_ j/\partial x_ i)_{i, j = 1, \ldots , c} is invertible in B' and such that A \to B' is given by x_ i \mapsto x_ i, see Lemma 16.3.6. After multiplying x_ i, i > n by an element of S and correspondingly modifying the equations f_ j we may assume B' \to S^{-1}\Lambda maps x_ i to \lambda _ i/1 for some \lambda _ i \in \Lambda for i > n. Choose a relation

1 = a_0 \det (\partial f_ j/\partial x_ i)_{i, j = 1, \ldots , c} + \sum \nolimits _{j = 1, \ldots , c} a_ jf_ j

for some a_ j \in S^{-1}R[x_1, \ldots , x_{n + m}]. Since each element of S is invertible in B' we may (by clearing denominators) assume that f_ j, a_ j \in R[x_1, \ldots , x_{n + m}] and that

s_0 = a_0 \det (\partial f_ j/\partial x_ i)_{i, j = 1, \ldots , c} + \sum \nolimits _{j = 1, \ldots , c} a_ jf_ j

for some s_0 \in S. Since g_ j maps to zero in S^{-1}R[x_1, \ldots , x_{n + m}]/(f_1, \ldots , x_ c) we can find elements s_ j \in S such that s_ j g_ j = 0 in R[x_1, \ldots , x_{n + m}]/(f_1, \ldots , f_ c). Since f_ j maps to zero in S^{-1}\Lambda we can find s'_ j \in S such that s'_ j f_ j(\lambda _1, \ldots , \lambda _{n + m}) = 0 in \Lambda . Consider the ring

B = R[x_1, \ldots , x_{n + m}]/ (s'_1f_1, \ldots , s'_ cf_ c, g_1, \ldots , g_ t)

and the factorization A \to B \to \Lambda with B \to \Lambda given by x_ i \mapsto \lambda _ i. We claim that s = s_0s_1 \ldots s_ ts'_1 \ldots s'_ c is elementary standard in B over R which finishes the proof. Namely, s_ j g_ j \in (f_1, \ldots , f_ c) and hence sg_ j \in (s'_1f_1, \ldots , s'_ cf_ c). Finally, we have

a_0\det (\partial s'_ jf_ j/\partial x_ i)_{i, j = 1, \ldots , c} + \sum \nolimits _{j = 1, \ldots , c} (s'_1 \ldots \hat{s'_ j} \ldots s'_ c) a_ j s'_ jf_ j = s_0s'_1\ldots s'_ c

which divides s as desired. \square

Proof. Assume PT holds for any Situation 16.8.1 where R is a field. Let R \to \Lambda be as in Situation 16.8.1 arbitrary. Note that R/I \to \Lambda /I\Lambda is another regular ring map of Noetherian rings, see More on Algebra, Lemma 15.41.3. Consider the set of ideals

\mathcal{I} = \{ I \subset R \mid R/I \to \Lambda /I\Lambda \text{ does not have PT}\}

We have to show that \mathcal{I} is empty. If this set is nonempty, then it contains a maximal element because R is Noetherian. Replacing R by R/I and \Lambda by \Lambda /I we obtain a situation where PT holds for R/I \to \Lambda /I\Lambda for any nonzero ideal of R. In particular, we see by applying Proposition 16.5.3 that R is a reduced ring.

Let A \to \Lambda be an R-algebra homomorphism with A of finite presentation. We have to find a factorization A \to B \to \Lambda with B smooth over R, see Algebra, Lemma 10.127.4.

Let S \subset R be the set of nonzerodivisors and consider the total ring of fractions Q = S^{-1}R of R. We know that Q = K_1 \times \ldots \times K_ n is a product of fields, see Algebra, Lemmas 10.25.4 and 10.31.6. By Lemma 16.8.2 and our assumption PT holds for the ring map S^{-1}R \to S^{-1}\Lambda . Hence we can find a factorization S^{-1}A \to B' \to S^{-1}\Lambda with B' smooth over S^{-1}R.

We apply Lemma 16.8.3 and find a factorization A \to B \to \Lambda such that some \pi \in S is elementary standard in B over R. After replacing A by B we may assume that \pi is elementary standard, hence strictly standard in A. We know that R/\pi ^8R \to \Lambda /\pi ^8\Lambda satisfies PT. Hence we can find a factorization R/\pi ^8 R \to A/\pi ^8A \to \bar C \to \Lambda /\pi ^8\Lambda with R/\pi ^8 R \to \bar C smooth. By Lemma 16.6.1 we can find an R-algebra map D \to \Lambda with D smooth over R and a factorization R/\pi ^4 R \to A/\pi ^4A \to D/\pi ^4D \to \Lambda /\pi ^4\Lambda . By Lemma 16.7.2 we can find A \to B \to \Lambda with B smooth over R which finishes the proof. \square


Comments (7)

Comment #2759 by Anonymous on

In 16.8.3 first paragraph, it should read "... is given by ..."

In 16.8.4 second to last paragraph it should say

Comment #2867 by on

Did not understand your first comment (I think what it says is correct). The second comment I do understand and I agree and I fixed it here. Thanks!

Comment #4928 by Shane on

It took me quite a while to track down the definition of an "elementary standard element". Perhaps add a hyperlink?

Comment #6042 by Harry Gindi on

Small nitpick in the hint for 07F3. This is only true for filtered colimits not all colimits (more or less by definition).

Comment #6043 by Harry Gindi on

(It's true more generally for sifted colimits (and since we're looking at products rather than finite limits) in the category of sets, but we're using here that filtered colimits in CRing are computed as the filtered colimit of the underlying sets, which I don't think holds for sifted colimits in CRing).


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.