Proof.
Let x \in I and y \in J. Then
\gamma _ n(xy) = y^ n\gamma _ n(x) = n! \delta _ n(y) \gamma _ n(x) = \delta _ n(y) x^ n = \delta _ n(xy).
Hence \gamma and \delta agree on a set of (additive) generators of IJ. By property (4) of Definition 23.2.1 it follows that they agree on all of IJ.
Assume \gamma and \delta agree on I \cap J. Let z \in I + J. Write z = x + y with x \in I and y \in J. Then we set
\epsilon _ n(z) = \sum \gamma _ i(x)\delta _{n - i}(y)
for all n \geq 1. To see that this is well defined, suppose that z = x' + y' is another representation with x' \in I and y' \in J. Then w = x - x' = y' - y \in I \cap J. Hence
\begin{align*} \sum \nolimits _{i + j = n} \gamma _ i(x)\delta _ j(y) & = \sum \nolimits _{i + j = n} \gamma _ i(x' + w)\delta _ j(y) \\ & = \sum \nolimits _{i' + l + j = n} \gamma _{i'}(x')\gamma _ l(w)\delta _ j(y) \\ & = \sum \nolimits _{i' + l + j = n} \gamma _{i'}(x')\delta _ l(w)\delta _ j(y) \\ & = \sum \nolimits _{i' + j' = n} \gamma _{i'}(x')\delta _{j'}(y + w) \\ & = \sum \nolimits _{i' + j' = n} \gamma _{i'}(x')\delta _{j'}(y') \end{align*}
as desired. Hence, we have defined maps \epsilon _ n : I + J \to I + J for all n \geq 1; it is easy to see that \epsilon _ n \mid _{I} = \gamma _ n and \epsilon _ n \mid _{J} = \delta _ n. Next, we prove conditions (1) – (5) of Definition 23.2.1 for the collection of maps \epsilon _ n. Properties (1) and (3) are clear. To see (4), suppose that z = x + y and z' = x' + y' with x, x' \in I and y, y' \in J and compute
\begin{align*} \epsilon _ n(z + z') & = \sum \nolimits _{a + b = n} \gamma _ a(x + x')\delta _ b(y + y') \\ & = \sum \nolimits _{i + i' + j + j' = n} \gamma _ i(x) \gamma _{i'}(x')\delta _ j(y)\delta _{j'}(y') \\ & = \sum \nolimits _{k = 0, \ldots , n} \sum \nolimits _{i+j=k} \gamma _ i(x)\delta _ j(y) \sum \nolimits _{i'+j'=n-k} \gamma _{i'}(x')\delta _{j'}(y') \\ & = \sum \nolimits _{k = 0, \ldots , n}\epsilon _ k(z)\epsilon _{n-k}(z') \end{align*}
as desired. Now we see that it suffices to prove (2) and (5) for elements of I or J, see Lemma 23.2.4. This is clear because \gamma and \delta are divided power structures.
The existence of a divided power structure \epsilon on I+J whose restrictions to I and J are \gamma and \delta is thus proven; its uniqueness is rather clear.
\square
Comments (0)