Proof.
The numbers (1), (2), (3), (4), (5) in this proof refer to the conditions listed in Definition 23.2.1. Applying (3) we see that if (2) and (5) hold for x then (2) and (5) hold for ax for all a \in A. Hence we see (b) implies (2) and (5) hold for a set of generators of I as an abelian group. Hence, by induction of the length of an expression in terms of these it suffices to prove that, given x, y \in I such that (2) and (5) hold for x and y, then (2) and (5) hold for x + y.
Proof of (2) for x + y. By (4) we have
\gamma _ n(x + y)\gamma _ m(x + y) = \sum \nolimits _{i + j = n,\ k + l = m} \gamma _ i(x)\gamma _ k(x)\gamma _ j(y)\gamma _ l(y)
Using (2) for x and y this equals
\sum \frac{(i + k)!}{i!k!}\frac{(j + l)!}{j!l!} \gamma _{i + k}(x)\gamma _{j + l}(y)
Comparing this with the expansion
\gamma _{n + m}(x + y) = \sum \gamma _ a(x)\gamma _ b(y)
we see that we have to prove that given a + b = n + m we have
\sum \nolimits _{i + k = a,\ j + l = b,\ i + j = n,\ k + l = m} \frac{(i + k)!}{i!k!}\frac{(j + l)!}{j!l!} = \frac{(n + m)!}{n!m!}.
Instead of arguing this directly, we note that the result is true for the ideal I = (x, y) in the polynomial ring \mathbf{Q}[x, y] because \gamma _ n(f) = f^ n/n!, f \in I defines a divided power structure on I. Hence the equality of rational numbers above is true.
Proof of (5) for x + y given that (1) – (4) hold and that (5) holds for x and y. We will again reduce the proof to an equality of rational numbers. Namely, using (4) we can write \gamma _ n(\gamma _ m(x + y)) = \gamma _ n(\sum \gamma _ i(x)\gamma _ j(y)). Using (4) we can write \gamma _ n(\gamma _ m(x + y)) as a sum of terms which are products of factors of the form \gamma _ k(\gamma _ i(x)\gamma _ j(y)). If i > 0 then
\begin{align*} \gamma _ k(\gamma _ i(x)\gamma _ j(y)) & = \gamma _ j(y)^ k\gamma _ k(\gamma _ i(x)) \\ & = \frac{(ki)!}{k!(i!)^ k} \gamma _ j(y)^ k \gamma _{ki}(x) \\ & = \frac{(ki)!}{k!(i!)^ k} \frac{(kj)!}{(j!)^ k} \gamma _{ki}(x) \gamma _{kj}(y) \end{align*}
using (3) in the first equality, (5) for x in the second, and (2) exactly k times in the third. Using (5) for y we see the same equality holds when i = 0. Continuing like this using all axioms but (5) we see that we can write
\gamma _ n(\gamma _ m(x + y)) = \sum \nolimits _{i + j = nm} c_{ij}\gamma _ i(x)\gamma _ j(y)
for certain universal constants c_{ij} \in \mathbf{Z}. Again the fact that the equality is valid in the polynomial ring \mathbf{Q}[x, y] implies that the coefficients c_{ij} are all equal to (nm)!/n!(m!)^ n as desired.
\square
Comments (2)
Comment #1331 by Shishir Agrawal on
Comment #1351 by Johan on