## 60.10 Sheaves on the crystalline site

Notation and assumptions as in Situation 60.7.5. In order to discuss the small and big crystalline sites of $X/S$ simultaneously in this section we let

A sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $\mathcal{C}$ gives rise to a *restriction* $\mathcal{F}_ T$ for every object $(U, T, \delta )$ of $\mathcal{C}$. Namely, $\mathcal{F}_ T$ is the Zariski sheaf on the scheme $T$ defined by the rule

for $W \subset T$ is open. Moreover, if $f : T \to T'$ is a morphism between objects $(U, T, \delta )$ and $(U', T', \delta ')$ of $\mathcal{C}$, then there is a canonical *comparison* map

Namely, if $W' \subset T'$ is open then $f$ induces a morphism

of $\mathcal{C}$, hence we can use the restriction mapping $(f|_{f^{-1}W'})^*$ of $\mathcal{F}$ to define a map $\mathcal{F}_{T'}(W') \to \mathcal{F}_ T(f^{-1}W')$. These maps are clearly compatible with further restriction, hence define an $f$-map from $\mathcal{F}_{T'}$ to $\mathcal{F}_ T$ (see Sheaves, Section 6.21 and especially Sheaves, Definition 6.21.7). Thus a map $c_ f$ as in (60.10.0.1). Note that if $f$ is an open immersion, then $c_ f$ is an isomorphism, because in that case $\mathcal{F}_ T$ is just the restriction of $\mathcal{F}_{T'}$ to $T$.

Conversely, given Zariski sheaves $\mathcal{F}_ T$ for every object $(U, T, \delta )$ of $\mathcal{C}$ and comparison maps $c_ f$ as above which (a) are isomorphisms for open immersions, and (b) satisfy a suitable cocycle condition, we obtain a sheaf on $\mathcal{C}$. This is proved exactly as in Topologies, Lemma 34.3.19.

The *structure sheaf* on $\mathcal{C}$ is the sheaf $\mathcal{O}_{X/S}$ defined by the rule

This is a sheaf by the definition of coverings in $\mathcal{C}$. Suppose that $\mathcal{F}$ is a sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_{X/S}$-modules. In this case the comparison mappings (60.10.0.1) define a comparison map

of $\mathcal{O}_ T$-modules.

Another type of example comes by starting with a sheaf $\mathcal{G}$ on $(\mathit{Sch}/X)_{Zar}$ or $X_{Zar}$ (depending on whether $\mathcal{C} = \text{CRIS}(X/S)$ or $\mathcal{C} = \text{Cris}(X/S)$). Then $\underline{\mathcal{G}}$ defined by the rule

is a sheaf on $\mathcal{C}$. In particular, if we take $\mathcal{G} = \mathbf{G}_ a = \mathcal{O}_ X$, then we obtain

There is a surjective map of sheaves $\mathcal{O}_{X/S} \to \underline{\mathbf{G}_ a}$ defined by the canonical maps $\Gamma (T, \mathcal{O}_ T) \to \Gamma (U, \mathcal{O}_ U)$ for objects $(U, T, \delta )$. The kernel of this map is denoted $\mathcal{J}_{X/S}$, hence a short exact sequence

Note that $\mathcal{J}_{X/S}$ comes equipped with a canonical divided power structure. After all, for each object $(U, T, \delta )$ the third component $\delta $ *is* a divided power structure on the kernel of $\mathcal{O}_ T \to \mathcal{O}_ U$. Hence the (big) crystalline topos is a divided power topos.

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (4)

Comment #4066 by Dan Dore on

Comment #4143 by Johan on

Comment #5434 by Hao on

Comment #5660 by Johan on