It turns out that a crystal is a very general gadget. However, the definition may be a bit hard to parse, so we first give the definition in the case of modules on the crystalline sites.
It turns out that we can relate these notions as follows.
Proof.
Assume (1). Let f : (U', T', \delta ') \to (U, T, \delta ) be an object of \mathcal{C}. We have to prove (a) \mathcal{F}_ T is a quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ T-module and (b) c_ f : f^*\mathcal{F}_ T \to \mathcal{F}_{T'} is an isomorphism. The assumption means that we can find a covering \{ (T_ i, U_ i, \delta _ i) \to (T, U, \delta )\} and for each i the restriction of \mathcal{F} to \mathcal{C}/(T_ i, U_ i, \delta _ i) has a global presentation. Since it suffices to prove (a) and (b) Zariski locally, we may replace f : (T', U', \delta ') \to (T, U, \delta ) by the base change to (T_ i, U_ i, \delta _ i) and assume that \mathcal{F} restricted to \mathcal{C}/(T, U, \delta ) has a global presentation
\bigoplus \nolimits _{j \in J} \mathcal{O}_{X/S}|_{\mathcal{C}/(U, T, \delta )} \longrightarrow \bigoplus \nolimits _{i \in I} \mathcal{O}_{X/S}|_{\mathcal{C}/(U, T, \delta )} \longrightarrow \mathcal{F}|_{\mathcal{C}/(U, T, \delta )} \longrightarrow 0
It is clear that this gives a presentation
\bigoplus \nolimits _{j \in J} \mathcal{O}_ T \longrightarrow \bigoplus \nolimits _{i \in I} \mathcal{O}_ T \longrightarrow \mathcal{F}_ T \longrightarrow 0
and hence (a) holds. Moreover, the presentation restricts to T' to give a similar presentation of \mathcal{F}_{T'}, whence (b) holds.
Assume (2). Let (U, T, \delta ) be an object of \mathcal{C}. We have to find a covering of (U, T, \delta ) such that \mathcal{F} has a global presentation when we restrict to the localization of \mathcal{C} at the members of the covering. Thus we may assume that T is affine. In this case we can choose a presentation
\bigoplus \nolimits _{j \in J} \mathcal{O}_ T \longrightarrow \bigoplus \nolimits _{i \in I} \mathcal{O}_ T \longrightarrow \mathcal{F}_ T \longrightarrow 0
as \mathcal{F}_ T is assumed to be a quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ T-module. Then by the crystal property of \mathcal{F} we see that this pulls back to a presentation of \mathcal{F}_{T'} for any morphism f : (U', T', \delta ') \to (U, T, \delta ) of \mathcal{C}. Thus the desired presentation of \mathcal{F}|_{\mathcal{C}/(U, T, \delta )}.
\square
Comments (0)