The Stacks project

Theorem 60.26.4. In Situation 60.26.1 let $(\mathcal{E}, F_\mathcal {E})$ be a nondegenerate $F$-crystal. Assume $A$ is a $p$-adically complete Noetherian ring and that $X \to S_0$ is proper smooth. Then the canonical map

\[ F_\mathcal {E} \circ (F_ X)_{\text{cris}}^* : R\Gamma (\text{Cris}(X/S), \mathcal{E}) \otimes ^\mathbf {L}_{A, \sigma } A \longrightarrow R\Gamma (\text{Cris}(X/S), \mathcal{E}) \]

becomes an isomorphism after inverting $p$.

Proof. We first write the arrow as a composition of three arrows. Namely, set

\[ X^{(1)} = X \times _{S_0, F_{S_0}} S_0 \]

and denote $F_{X/S_0} : X \to X^{(1)}$ the relative Frobenius morphism. Denote $\mathcal{E}^{(1)}$ the base change of $\mathcal{E}$ by $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\sigma )$, in other words the pullback of $\mathcal{E}$ to $\text{Cris}(X^{(1)}/S)$ by the morphism of crystalline topoi associated to the commutative diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ X^{(1)} \ar[r] \ar[d] & X \ar[d] \\ S \ar[r]^{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\sigma )} & S } \]

Then we have the base change map
\begin{equation} \label{crystalline-equation-base-change-sigma} R\Gamma (\text{Cris}(X/S), \mathcal{E}) \otimes ^\mathbf {L}_{A, \sigma } A \longrightarrow R\Gamma (\text{Cris}(X^{(1)}/S), \mathcal{E}^{(1)}) \end{equation}

see Remark 60.24.8. Note that the composition of $F_{X/S_0} : X \to X^{(1)}$ with the projection $X^{(1)} \to X$ is the absolute Frobenius morphism $F_ X$. Hence we see that $F_{X/S_0}^*\mathcal{E}^{(1)} = (F_ X)_{\text{cris}}^*\mathcal{E}$. Thus pullback by $F_{X/S_0}$ is a map
\begin{equation} \label{crystalline-equation-to-prove} F_{X/S_0}^* : R\Gamma (\text{Cris}(X^{(1)}/S), \mathcal{E}^{(1)}) \longrightarrow R\Gamma (\text{Cris}(X/S), (F_ X)^*_{\text{cris}}\mathcal{E}) \end{equation}

Finally we can use $F_\mathcal {E}$ to get a map
\begin{equation} \label{crystalline-equation-F-E} R\Gamma (\text{Cris}(X/S), (F_ X)^*_{\text{cris}}\mathcal{E}) \longrightarrow R\Gamma (\text{Cris}(X/S), \mathcal{E}) \end{equation}

The map of the theorem is the composition of the three maps (, (, and ( above. The first is a quasi-isomorphism modulo all powers of $p$ by Remark 60.24.9. Hence it is a quasi-isomorphism since the complexes involved are perfect in $D(A)$ see Remark 60.24.13. The third map is a quasi-isomorphism after inverting $p$ simply because $F_\mathcal {E}$ has an inverse up to a power of $p$, see Remark 60.26.3. Finally, the second is an isomorphism after inverting $p$ by Lemma 60.25.6. $\square$

Comments (0)

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 07N5. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.