The Stacks project

Lemma 31.30.4. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be a quasi-coherent graded $\mathcal{O}_ S$-algebra. Let $p : X = \underline{\text{Proj}}_ S(\mathcal{A}) \to S$ be the relative Proj of $\mathcal{A}$. The following conditions are equivalent

  1. $\mathcal{A}_0$ is a finite type $\mathcal{O}_ S$-module and $\mathcal{A}$ is of finite type as an $\mathcal{A}_0$-algebra,

  2. $\mathcal{A}_0$ is a finite type $\mathcal{O}_ S$-module and $\mathcal{A}$ is of finite type as an $\mathcal{O}_ S$-algebra

If these conditions hold, then $p$ is locally projective and in particular proper.

Proof. Assume that $\mathcal{A}_0$ is a finite type $\mathcal{O}_ S$-module. Choose an affine open $U = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) \subset X$ such that $\mathcal{A}$ corresponds to a graded $R$-algebra $A$ with $A_0$ a finite $R$-module. Condition (1) means that (after possibly localizing further on $S$) that $A$ is a finite type $A_0$-algebra and condition (2) means that (after possibly localizing further on $S$) that $A$ is a finite type $R$-algebra. Thus these conditions imply each other by Algebra, Lemma 10.6.2.

A locally projective morphism is proper, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.43.5. Thus we may now assume that $S = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ and $X = \text{Proj}(A)$ and that $A_0$ is finite over $R$ and $A$ of finite type over $R$. We will show that $X = \text{Proj}(A) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ is projective. We urge the reader to prove this for themselves, by directly constructing a closed immersion of $X$ into a projective space over $R$, instead of reading the argument we give below.

By Lemma 31.30.2 we see that $X$ is of finite type over $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$. Constructions, Lemma 27.10.6 tells us that $\mathcal{O}_ X(d)$ is ample on $X$ for some $d \geq 1$ (see Properties, Section 28.26). Hence $X \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ is quasi-projective (by Morphisms, Definition 29.40.1). By Morphisms, Lemma 29.43.12 we conclude that $X$ is isomorphic to an open subscheme of a scheme projective over $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$. Therefore, to finish the proof, it suffices to show that $X \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ is universally closed (use Morphisms, Lemma 29.41.7). This follows from Lemma 31.30.3. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0800. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.