The Stacks project

Remark 26.21.18. Let $P$ equal one of the following $4$ properties: “quasi-separated”, “separated”, “quasi-compact and quasi-separated”, or “quasi-compact and separated”. Then the following are true

  1. Any affine scheme has $P$.

  2. Given a morphism $f : X \to Y$ of scheme where $Y$ has $P$, then $f$ has $P$ if and only if $X$ has $P$.

  3. If $X \to Y$ and $Z \to Y$ are morphisms of schemes and $X$, $Y$, $Z$ have $P$, then $X \times _ Y Z$ has $P$.

Statement (1) is clear. Let $f : X \to Y$ be as in (2). If $f$ has $P$, then so does $X$ by Lemmas 26.21.12 and 26.19.4 applied to $X \to Y \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{Z})$. If $X$ has $P$, then so does $f$ by Lemmas 26.21.13 and 26.21.14 applied to $X \to Y \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{Z})$. Let $X \to Y$ and $Z \to Y$ be as in (3). Then the projection $X \times _ Y Z \to Z$ has $P$ as a base change of the arrow $X \to Y$ which has $P$ by (2), see Lemmas 26.21.12 and 26.19.3. Hence $X \times _ Y Z$ has $P$ by (2).


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 23 comment(s) on Section 26.21: Separation axioms

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0816. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.