Lemma 29.43.16. Let $S$ be a scheme which admits an ample invertible sheaf. Then

any projective morphism $X \to S$ is H-projective, and

any quasi-projective morphism $X \to S$ is H-quasi-projective.

Lemma 29.43.16. Let $S$ be a scheme which admits an ample invertible sheaf. Then

any projective morphism $X \to S$ is H-projective, and

any quasi-projective morphism $X \to S$ is H-quasi-projective.

**Proof.**
The assumptions on $S$ imply that $S$ is quasi-compact and separated, see Properties, Definition 28.26.1 and Lemma 28.26.11 and Constructions, Lemma 27.8.8. Hence Lemma 29.43.12 applies and we see that (1) implies (2). Let $\mathcal{E}$ be a finite type quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ S$-module. By our definition of projective morphisms it suffices to show that $\mathbf{P}(\mathcal{E}) \to S$ is H-projective. If $\mathcal{E}$ is generated by finitely many global sections, then the corresponding surjection $\mathcal{O}_ S^{\oplus n} \to \mathcal{E}$ induces a closed immersion

\[ \mathbf{P}(\mathcal{E}) \longrightarrow \mathbf{P}(\mathcal{O}_ S^{\oplus n}) = \mathbf{P}^{n - 1}_ S \]

as desired. In general, let $\mathcal{L}$ be an ample invertible sheaf on $S$. By Properties, Proposition 28.26.13 there exists an integer $n$ such that $\mathcal{E} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ S} \mathcal{L}^{\otimes n}$ is globally generated by finitely many sections. Since $\mathbf{P}(\mathcal{E}) = \mathbf{P}(\mathcal{E} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ S} \mathcal{L}^{\otimes n})$ by Constructions, Lemma 27.20.1 this finishes the proof. $\square$

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (3)

Comment #8582 by AAK on

Comment #8583 by AAK on

Comment #9160 by Stacks project on