History of tag 089E
Go back to the tag's page.
| type |
time |
link |
|
changed the proof
|
2013-05-01 |
c7e9d24 |
Tags: added new tags
|
|
changed the proof
|
2013-04-24 |
e1986b8 |
Fix the fix
Previous argument was not complete.
|
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2013-04-24 |
34344b1 |
Hypotheses of Lemma 089E
Dear Johan,
I was wondering: in the lemma in question, could one weaken the
assumptions on g by requiring that it be a quasi-compact schematic
(representable by schemes) morphism of algebraic spaces? The present
assumptions imply that Y is a scheme already which perhaps was not
intended.
Best,
Kestutis
Answer: Yes! Thanks!
In this commit we do what is asked above and we modify the proof
accordingly.
|
|
assigned tag 089E
|
2012-10-19 |
1ab02c4
|
Tags: added new tags
|
|
created statement with label lemma-flat-base-change-scheme-theoretic-image in spaces-morphisms.tex
|
2012-10-18 |
7246ded |
Variant valuative criterion
Same as previous commit but this time for algebraic spaces
|