Proof.
We will use Lemma 47.3.5 to prove (1). Suppose that E \subset E' \subset I and that E' is an essential extension of E. We will show that E' = E. If not, then we can find x \in E' and x \not\in E. Let J = \{ a \in R \mid ax \in E\} . Since R is Noetherian, we may write J = (g_1, \ldots , g_ t) for some g_ i \in R. By definition E is the set of elements of I annihilated by powers of f, so we may choose integers n_ i so that f^{n_ i}g_ ix = 0. Set n = \mathrm{max}\{ n_ i \} . Then x' = f^ n x is an element of E' not in E and is annihilated by J. Set J' = \{ a \in R \mid ax' \in E \} so J \subset J'. Conversely, we have a \in J' if and only if ax' \in E if and only if f^ m a x' = 0 for some m \geq 0. But then f^ m a x' = f^{m + n} a x implies ax \in E, i.e., a \in J. Hence J = J'. Thus J = J' = \text{Ann}(x'), so Rx' \cap E = 0. Hence E' is not an essential extension of E, a contradiction.
To prove (2) write J = (f_1, \ldots , f_ t). Then I[J^\infty ] is equal to
(\ldots ((I[f_1^\infty ])[f_2^\infty ])\ldots )[f_ t^\infty ]
and the result follows from (1) and induction.
\square
Comments (2)
Comment #6237 by Owen on
Comment #6363 by Johan on
There are also: