Proof.
If (2) holds, then K is derived complete with respect to I by Lemma 15.91.16. Conversely, assume that K is derived complete with respect to I. Consider the filtrations
K_ n^\bullet \supset \sigma _{\geq -r + 1}K_ n^\bullet \supset \sigma _{\geq -r + 2}K_ n^\bullet \supset \ldots \supset \sigma _{\geq -1}K_ n^\bullet \supset \sigma _{\geq 0}K_ n^\bullet = A
by stupid truncations (Homology, Section 12.15). Because the construction R\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits (K \otimes E) is exact in the second variable (Lemma 15.87.11) we see that it suffices to show
R\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits \left( K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} (\sigma _{\geq p}K_ n^\bullet / \sigma _{\geq p + 1}K_ n^\bullet ) \right) = 0
for p < 0. The explicit description of the Koszul complexes above shows that
R\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits \left( K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} (\sigma _{\geq p}K_ n^\bullet / \sigma _{\geq p + 1}K_ n^\bullet ) \right) = \bigoplus \nolimits _{i_1, \ldots , i_{-p}} T(K, f_{i_1}\ldots f_{i_{-p}})
which is zero for p < 0 by assumption on K.
\square
Comments (0)
There are also: