The Stacks project

Lemma 37.61.3. Let $X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes such that $X \to X \times _ Y X$ is flat. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be an $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module. If $\mathcal{F}$ is flat over $Y$, then $\mathcal{F}$ is flat over $X$.

Proof. Let $x \in X$ with image $y = f(x)$ in $Y$. Since $X \to X \times _ Y X$ is flat, we see that $\mathcal{O}_{X, x} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_{Y, y}} \mathcal{O}_{X, x} \to \mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ is flat. Hence the result follows from More on Algebra, Lemma 15.104.2 and the definitions. $\square$


Comments (2)

Comment #6299 by on

It seems to me that we can reproduce the argument in Tag 092C instead of referring to it, since it is even clearer in this context, without passing to stalks:

We need to check that the functor is exact. The point is that we can take the "external tensor product" (this is essentially the argument in Tag 092C, but it seems even clearer when we write it in the language of algebraic geometry): let be two projections of which a common section is the diagonal . Then we have . Note that the pushforward of to is the tensor product of and over , the result follows from the assumed flatness.

Comment #6411 by on

OK, yes, but I am going to leave as is for now.


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 094R. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.