Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 59.64.8. Let X be a connected scheme. Let \Lambda be a ring and let \mathcal{F} be a locally constant sheaf of \Lambda -modules. Then there exists a \Lambda -module M and an étale covering \{ U_ i \to X\} such that \mathcal{F}|_{U_ i} \cong \underline{M}|_{U_ i}.

Proof. Choose an étale covering \{ U_ i \to X\} such that \mathcal{F}|_{U_ i} is constant, say \mathcal{F}|_{U_ i} \cong \underline{M_ i}_{U_ i}. Observe that U_ i \times _ X U_ j is empty if M_ i is not isomorphic to M_ j. For each \Lambda -module M let I_ M = \{ i \in I \mid M_ i \cong M\} . As étale morphisms are open we see that U_ M = \bigcup _{i \in I_ M} \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(U_ i \to X) is an open subset of X. Then X = \coprod U_ M is a disjoint open covering of X. As X is connected only one U_ M is nonempty and the lemma follows. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.