Lemma 92.28.1. In the situation above, if $X$ and $Y$ are Tor independent over $B$, then the object $E$ in (92.28.0.1) is zero. In this case we have

**Proof.**
Choose a scheme $W$ and a surjective étale morphism $W \to B$. Choose a scheme $U$ and a surjective étale morphism $U \to X \times _ B W$. Choose a scheme $V$ and a surjective étale morphism $V \to Y \times _ B W$. Then $U \times _ W V \to X \times _ B Y$ is surjective étale too. Hence it suffices to prove that the restriction of $E$ to $U \times _ W V$ is zero. By Lemma 92.26.3 and Derived Categories of Spaces, Lemma 75.20.3 this reduces us to the case of schemes. Taking suitable affine opens we reduce to the case of affine schemes. Using Lemma 92.24.2 we reduce to the case of a tensor product of rings, i.e., to Lemma 92.15.1.
$\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)