Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 9.10.5. Let F be a field. Let \overline{F} be an algebraic closure of F. Let M/F be an algebraic extension. Then there is a morphism of F-extensions M \to \overline{F}.

Proof. Consider the set I of pairs (E, \varphi ) where F \subset E \subset M is a subextension and \varphi : E \to \overline{F} is a morphism of F-extensions. We partially order the set I by declaring (E, \varphi ) \leq (E', \varphi ') if and only if E \subset E' and \varphi '|_ E = \varphi . If T = \{ (E_ t, \varphi _ t)\} \subset I is a totally ordered subset, then \bigcup \varphi _ t : \bigcup E_ t \to \overline{F} is an element of I. Thus every totally ordered subset of I has an upper bound. By Zorn's lemma there exists a maximal element (E, \varphi ) in I. We claim that E = M, which will finish the proof. If not, then pick \alpha \in M, \alpha \not\in E. The \alpha is algebraic over E, see Lemma 9.8.4. Let P be the minimal polynomial of \alpha over E. Let P^\varphi be the image of P by \varphi in \overline{F}[x]. Since \overline{F} is algebraically closed there is a root \beta of P^\varphi in \overline{F}. Then we can extend \varphi to \varphi ' : E(\alpha ) = E[x]/(P) \to \overline{F} by mapping x to \beta . This contradicts the maximality of (E, \varphi ) as desired. \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 9.10: Algebraic closure

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.