Lemma 9.10.5. Let F be a field. Let \overline{F} be an algebraic closure of F. Let M/F be an algebraic extension. Then there is a morphism of F-extensions M \to \overline{F}.
Proof. Consider the set I of pairs (E, \varphi ) where F \subset E \subset M is a subextension and \varphi : E \to \overline{F} is a morphism of F-extensions. We partially order the set I by declaring (E, \varphi ) \leq (E', \varphi ') if and only if E \subset E' and \varphi '|_ E = \varphi . If T = \{ (E_ t, \varphi _ t)\} \subset I is a totally ordered subset, then \bigcup \varphi _ t : \bigcup E_ t \to \overline{F} is an element of I. Thus every totally ordered subset of I has an upper bound. By Zorn's lemma there exists a maximal element (E, \varphi ) in I. We claim that E = M, which will finish the proof. If not, then pick \alpha \in M, \alpha \not\in E. The \alpha is algebraic over E, see Lemma 9.8.4. Let P be the minimal polynomial of \alpha over E. Let P^\varphi be the image of P by \varphi in \overline{F}[x]. Since \overline{F} is algebraically closed there is a root \beta of P^\varphi in \overline{F}. Then we can extend \varphi to \varphi ' : E(\alpha ) = E[x]/(P) \to \overline{F} by mapping x to \beta . This contradicts the maximality of (E, \varphi ) as desired. \square
Comments (0)
There are also: