The Stacks project

Lemma 12.30.1. Let $\mathcal{I}$ be a category, let $\mathcal{A}$ be a pre-additive Karoubian category, and let $M : \mathcal{I} \to \mathcal{A}$ be a diagram.

  1. Assume $\mathcal{I}$ is filtered. The following are equivalent

    1. $M$ is essentially constant,

    2. $X = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits M$ exists and there exists a cofinal filtered subcategory $\mathcal{I}' \subset \mathcal{I}$ and for $i' \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{I}')$ a direct sum decomposition $M_{i'} = X_{i'} \oplus Z_{i'}$ such that $X_{i'}$ maps isomorphically to $X$ and $Z_{i'}$ to zero in $M_{i''}$ for some $i' \to i''$ in $\mathcal{I}'$.

  2. Assume $\mathcal{I}$ is cofiltered. The following are equivalent

    1. $M$ is essentially constant,

    2. $X = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits M$ exists and there exists an initial cofiltered subcategory $\mathcal{I}' \subset \mathcal{I}$ and for $i' \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{I}')$ a direct sum decomposition $M_{i'} = X_{i'} \oplus Z_{i'}$ such that $X$ maps isomorphically to $X_{i'}$ and $M_{i''} \to Z_{i'}$ is zero for some $i'' \to i'$ in $\mathcal{I}'$.

Proof. Assume (1)(a), i.e., $\mathcal{I}$ is filtered and $M$ is essentially constant. Let $X = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits M_ i$. Choose $i$ and $X \to M_ i$ as in Categories, Definition 4.22.1. Let $\mathcal{I}'$ be the full subcategory consisting of objects which are the target of a morphism with source $i$. Suppose $i' \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{I}')$ and choose a morphism $i \to i'$. Then $X \to M_ i \to M_{i'}$ composed with $M_{i'} \to X$ is the identity on $X$. As $\mathcal{A}$ is Karoubian, we find a direct summand decomposition $M_{i'} = X_{i'} \oplus Z_{i'}$, where $Z_{i'} = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(M_{i'} \to X)$ and $X_{i'}$ maps isomorphically to $X$. Pick $i \to k$ and $i' \to k$ such that $M_{i'} \to X \to M_ i \to M_ k$ equals $M_{i'} \to M_ k$ as in Categories, Definition 4.22.1. Then we see that $M_{i'} \to M_ k$ annihilates $Z_{i'}$. Thus (1)(b) holds.

Assume (1)(b), i.e., $\mathcal{I}$ is filtered and we have $\mathcal{I}' \subset \mathcal{I}$ and for $i' \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{I}')$ a direct sum decomposition $M_{i'} = X_{i'} \oplus Z_{i'}$ as stated in the lemma. To see that $M$ is essentially constant we can replace $\mathcal{I}$ by $\mathcal{I}'$, see Categories, Lemma 4.22.11. Pick any $i \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{I})$ and denote $X \to M_ i$ the inverse of the isomorphism $X_ i \to X$ followed by the inclusion map $X_ i \to M_ i$. If $j$ is a second object, then choose $j \to k$ such that $Z_ j \to M_ k$ is zero. Since $\mathcal{I}$ is filtered we may also assume there is a morphism $i \to k$ (after possibly increasing $k$). Then $M_ j \to X \to M_ i \to M_ k$ and $M_ j \to M_ k$ both annihilate $Z_ j$. Thus after postcomposing by a morphism $M_ k \to M_ l$ which annihilates the summand $Z_ k$, we find that $M_ j \to X \to M_ i \to M_ l$ and $M_ j \to M_ l$ are equal, i.e., $M$ is essentially constant.

The proof of (2) is dual. $\square$


Comments (2)

Comment #540 by Nuno on

(i) At the first line of the lemma: a Karoubian category is by definition (at least here) pre-additive, so we should say only "let be a Karoubian category" (ii) This is probably already known, but the site is not displaying correctly nested lists (iii) If I am not missing something, we should add in 2) some compatibility conditions between the isomorphisms , something like this: for every in , we have a commutative diagram where the first horizontal morphism is the composition of the isomorphisms . We will need to adapt the proof (1)->(2) and will not be a full subcategory in this case.

Comment #551 by on

OK, I decided to fix this by assuming the subcategory is filtered (resp. cofiltered) in the statement of the lemma. This is anyway needed because we are using Lemma 4.22.11. I believe that with that assumption the statement of the lemma is correct. Namely, although I see what you are saying I think the argument of (2) (1) is correct. Namely, both and annihilate and both factor through which annihilates . Hence it suffices to show that the two induced maps are the same, which is true because all the maps between the 's commute with the projection maps to .

In other words, I want think of all the maps between the for in as upper triangular matrices with in the upper left corner and where for with the right lower corner is zero. Then we claim such a system is essentially constant.


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0A2E. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.