Lemma 47.12.3. With notation as in Lemma 47.12.1. For objects K, L in D(A) there is a canonical isomorphism
in D(A).
Lemma 47.12.3. With notation as in Lemma 47.12.1. For objects K, L in D(A) there is a canonical isomorphism
in D(A).
Proof. Say I = (f_1, \ldots , f_ r). Denote C = (A \to \prod A_{f_ i} \to \ldots \to A_{f_1 \ldots f_ r}) the alternating Čech complex. Then derived completion is given by R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(C, -) (More on Algebra, Lemma 15.91.10) and local cohomology by C \otimes ^\mathbf {L} - (Lemma 47.9.1). Combining the isomorphism
(More on Algebra, Lemma 15.73.1) and the map
(More on Algebra, Lemma 15.73.6) we obtain a map
On the other hand, the right hand side is derived complete as it is equal to
Thus \gamma factors through the derived completion of R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(K, L) by the universal property of derived completion. However, the derived completion goes inside the R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.91.13 and we obtain the desired map.
To show that the map of the lemma is an isomorphism we may assume that K and L are derived complete, i.e., K = K^\wedge and L = L^\wedge . In this case we are looking at the map
By Proposition 47.12.2 we know that the cohomology groups of the left and the right hand side coincide. In other words, we have to check that the map \gamma sends a morphism \alpha : K \to L in D(A) to the morphism R\Gamma _ Z(\alpha ) : R\Gamma _ Z(K) \to R\Gamma _ Z(L). We omit the verification (hint: note that R\Gamma _ Z(\alpha ) is just the map \alpha \otimes \text{id}_ C : K \otimes ^\mathbf {L} C \to L \otimes ^\mathbf {L} C which is almost the same as the construction of the map in More on Algebra, Lemma 15.73.6). \square
Comments (0)
There are also: