History of tag 0A89
Go back to the tag's page.
type |
time |
link |
changed the statement
|
2024-04-12 |
a5e0ddf |
missing anti
THanks to Haohao Liu
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0A89#comment-8358
|
changed the proof
|
2020-09-17 |
dcea2cb |
\Hom_k(H^i(U, F), k) = H^{-i}_c(U, RHom(F, omega))
for F coherent on U sep fin type over field k
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2017-06-29 |
b0ad73c |
Notational changes only
Try to indicate the sheaf of rings we are taking R\SheafHom over in the
chapter on duality on schemes because in that chapter we do some pretty
subtle things where confusion is possible...
|
moved the statement to file duality.tex
|
2017-06-06 |
a866f45 |
Three new chapters
Titles: "Duality for Schemes", "Discriminants", "Local Cohomology"
|
changed the proof
|
2017-06-06 |
a866f45 |
Three new chapters
Titles: "Duality for Schemes", "Discriminants", "Local Cohomology"
|
changed the proof
|
2016-08-31 |
14741d6 |
Corrected typos in dualizing.tex guide.tex homology.tex intersection.tex limits.tex models.tex modules.tex more-groupoids.tex pic.tex
|
changed the proof
|
2015-03-30 |
881f484 |
Try to make usage of RHom more uniform
|
changed the statement
|
2014-12-10 |
c1b2bf7 |
A bit more on the bootstrap procedure
|
changed the proof
|
2014-05-13 |
ee8973b |
Upper shriek transforms dualizing into dualizing
|
changed the statement and the proof
|
2014-05-11 |
93dad72 |
Add two proofs
|
assigned tag 0A89
|
2014-05-10 |
9e227cd
|
Tags: Added new tags
|
created statement with label lemma-dualizing-schemes in dualizing.tex
|
2014-05-08 |
e96773c |
A little bit more about dualizing complexes
Existence implies universally catenary and finite dimension for rings
Definition for locally Noetherian schemes... We just say it should be
affine locally a dualizing complex. This is not the most wonderful way
to do it, but it avoids talking about finite injective dimensions for
complexes of modules over a sheaf of rings.
|