Lemma 81.10.11. In Situation 81.10.6 there exists an fpqc covering \{ X_ i \to X\} _{i \in I} refining the family \{ U \to X, Y \to X\} .
Proof. For the definition and general properties of fpqc coverings we refer to Topologies, Section 34.9. In particular, we can first choose an étale covering \{ X_ i \to X\} with X_ i affine and by base changing Y, Z, and U to each X_ i we reduce to the case where X is affine. In this case U is quasi-compact and hence a finite union U = U_1 \cup \ldots \cup U_ n of affine opens. Then Z is quasi-compact hence also f^{-1}Z is quasi-compact. Thus we can choose an affine scheme W and an étale morphism h : W \to Y such that h^{-1}f^{-1}Z \to f^{-1}Z is surjective. Say W = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B) and h^{-1}f^{-1}Z = V(J) where J \subset B is an ideal of finite type. By Pro-étale Cohomology, Lemma 61.5.1 there exists a localization B \to B' such that points of \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B') correspond exactly to points of W = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B) specializing to h^{-1}f^{-1}Z = V(J). It follows that the composition \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B') \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B) = W \to Y \to X is flat as by assumption f : Y \to X is flat at all the points of f^{-1}Z. Then \{ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B') \to X, U_1 \to X, \ldots , U_ n \to X\} is an fpqc covering by Topologies, Lemma 34.9.2. \square
Comments (0)