The Stacks project

Lemma 4.25.1. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a big1 category which has limits. Let $F : \mathcal{C} \to \textit{Sets}$ be a functor. Assume that

  1. $F$ commutes with limits,

  2. there exist a family $\{ x_ i\} _{i \in I}$ of objects of $\mathcal{C}$ and for each $i \in I$ an element $f_ i \in F(x_ i)$ such that for $y \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})$ and $g \in F(y)$ there exist an $i$ and a morphism $\varphi : x_ i \to y$ with $F(\varphi )(f_ i) = g$.

Then $F$ is representable, i.e., there exists an object $x$ of $\mathcal{C}$ such that

\[ F(y) = \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(x, y) \]

functorially in $y$.

Proof. Let $\mathcal{I}$ be the category whose objects are the pairs $(x_ i, f_ i)$ and whose morphisms $(x_ i, f_ i) \to (x_{i'}, f_{i'})$ are maps $\varphi : x_ i \to x_{i'}$ in $\mathcal{C}$ such that $F(\varphi )(f_ i) = f_{i'}$. Set

\[ x = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{(x_ i, f_ i) \in \mathcal{I}} x_ i \]

(this will not be the $x$ we are looking for, see below). The limit exists by assumption. As $F$ commutes with limits we have

\[ F(x) = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{(x_ i, f_ i) \in \mathcal{I}} F(x_ i). \]

Hence there is a universal element $f \in F(x)$ which maps to $f_ i \in F(x_ i)$ under $F$ applied to the projection map $x \to x_ i$. Using $f$ we obtain a transformation of functors

\[ \xi : \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(x, - ) \longrightarrow F(-) \]

see Section 4.3. Let $y$ be an arbitrary object of $\mathcal{C}$ and let $g \in F(y)$. Choose $x_ i \to y$ such that $f_ i$ maps to $g$ which is possible by assumption. Then $F$ applied to the maps

\[ x \longrightarrow x_ i \longrightarrow y \]

(the first being the projection map of the limit defining $x$) sends $f$ to $g$. Hence the transformation $\xi $ is surjective.

In order to find the object representing $F$ we let $e : x' \to x$ be the equalizer of all self maps $\varphi : x \to x$ with $F(\varphi )(f) = f$. Since $F$ commutes with limits, it commutes with equalizers, and we see there exists an $f' \in F(x')$ mapping to $f$ in $F(x)$. Since $\xi $ is surjective and since $f'$ maps to $f$ we see that also $\xi ' : \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _\mathcal {C}(x', -) \to F(-)$ is surjective. Finally, suppose that $a, b : x' \to y$ are two maps such that $F(a)(f') = F(b)(f')$. We have to show $a = b$. Consider the equalizer $e' : x'' \to x'$. Again we find $f'' \in F(x'')$ mapping to $f'$. Choose a map $\psi : x \to x''$ such that $F(\psi )(f) = f''$. Then we see that $e \circ e' \circ \psi : x \to x$ is a morphism with $F(e \circ e' \circ \psi )(f) = f$. Hence $e \circ e' \circ \psi \circ e = e$. Since $e$ is a monomorphism, this implies that $e'$ is an epimorphism, thus $a = b$ as desired. $\square$

[1] See Remark 4.2.2.

Comments (4)

Comment #2300 by Marco D'Addezio on

There is a typo in the last sentence, should be . Actually I would change the entire sentence with the following: "Since is a monomorphism, this implies that is an epimorphism, thus as desired."

Comment #3328 by Kazuki Masugi on

Typo in the proof, “two maps such that F(a)(f)=F(b)(f).” should be “two maps such that F(a)(f’)=F(b)(f’).”

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 4.25: A criterion for representability

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0AHN. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.